Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20878717›Full record

ReviewGenetic epidemiology2010

A review of statistical methods for testing genetic anticipation: looking for an answer in Lynch syndrome.

Philip S Boonstra, Stephen B Gruber, Victoria M Raymond, Shu-Chen Huang, Susanne Timshel, Mef Nilbert, Bhramar Mukherjee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetic epidemiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Auditory Phenotypes Associated withChinese medical journal · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philip S BoonstraDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Stephen B Gruber
Victoria M Raymond
Shu-Chen Huang
Susanne Timshel
Mef Nilbert
Bhramar Mukherjee

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF COLORECTAL CANCERR01CA081488 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GRUBER, STEPHEN B · 1999 to 2008
$9.2M
Biostatistics Training Program in Cancer ResearchT32CA083654 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani, Kelley McLain Kidwell · 2002 to 2026
$4.3M
Biostatistics Training for Research in the BiosciencesT32GM074910 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KALBFLEISCH, JOHN D · 2006 to 2010
$1.1M
Synergism of Gene and Environment in Cancer Studies: A New Bayesian ApproachR03CA130045 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MUKHERJEE, BHRAMAR · 2007 to 2008
$144k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS P30 CA46592NCI NIH HHS R01 CA081488NCI NIH HHS R01 CA81488NCI NIH HHS R03 CA130045NCI NIH HHS R03 CA130045-01NCI NIH HHS T32 CA083654NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM074910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anticipation, manifested through decreasing age of onset or increased severity in successive generations, has been noted in several genetic diseases. Statistical methods for genetic anticipation range from a simple use of the paired t-test for age of onset restricted to affected parent-child pairs to a recently proposed random effects model which includes extended pedigree data and unaffected family members [Larsen et al., 2009]. A naive use of the paired t-test is biased for the simple reason that age of onset has to be less than the age at ascertainment (interview) for both affected parent and child, and this right truncation effect is more pronounced in children than in parents. In this study, we first review different statistical methods for testing genetic anticipation in affected parent-child pairs that address the issue of bias due to right truncation. Using affected parent-child pair data, we compare the paired t-test with the parametric conditional maximum likelihood approach of Huang and Vieland [1997] and the nonparametric approach of Rabinowitz and Yang [1999] in terms of Type I error and power under various simulation settings and departures from the modeling assumptions. We especially investigate the issue of multiplex ascertainment and its effect on the different methods. We then focus on exploring genetic anticipation in Lynch syndrome and analyze new data on the age of onset in affected parent-child pairs from families seen at the University of Michigan Cancer Genetics clinic with a mutation in one of the three main mismatch repair (MMR) genes. In contrast to the clinic-based population, we re-analyze data on a population-based Lynch syndrome cohort, derived from the Danish HNPCC-register. Both datasets indicate evidence of genetic anticipation in Lynch syndrome. We then expand our review to incorporate recently proposed statistical methods that consider family instead of affected pairs as the sampling unit. These prospective censored regression models offer additional flexibility to incorporate unaffected family members, familial correlation and other covariates into the analysis. An expanded dataset from the Danish HNPCC-register is analyzed by this alternative set of methods.

Indexed as

Anticipation, GeneticColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleHumansMaleModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalMolecular EpidemiologyMutationPedigreeProportional Hazards ModelsRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID20878717
PMCPMC3894615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.