ReviewGenetic epidemiology2010
A review of statistical methods for testing genetic anticipation: looking for an answer in Lynch syndrome.
Review in Genetic epidemiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk of multiple myeloma and other malignancies among first- and second-degree relatives of patients with multiple myeloma: A population-based study.European journal of haematology · 2022Article
- Epilepsy in families: Age at onset is a familial trait, independent of syndrome.Annals of neurology · 2019Article
- Intra-Familial Phenotypic Heterogeneity and Telomere Abnormality in von Hippel- Lindau Disease: Implications for Personalized Surveillance Plan and Pathogenesis of VHL-Associated Tumors.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Simulating pedigrees ascertained for multiple disease-affected relatives.Source code for biology and medicine · 2018Article
- Factors influencing the age at onset in familial frontotemporal lobar dementia: Important weight of genetics.Neurology. Genetics · 2017Article
- Genetic anticipation in Swedish Lynch syndrome families.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- Clinical Auditory Phenotypes Associated withChinese medical journal · 2017Article
- Ascertainment bias causes false signal of anticipation in genetic prion disease.American journal of human genetics · 2014Article
- Fertility and apparent genetic anticipation in Lynch syndrome.Familial cancer · 2014Article
- Genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer: where we stand and future perspectives.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Potential genetic anticipation in hereditary leiomyomatosis-renal cell cancer (HLRCC).Familial cancer · 2014Review
- No evidence of genetic anticipation in a large family with Lynch syndrome.Familial cancer · 2014Article
- Telomere length and genetic anticipation in Lynch syndrome.PloS one · 2013Article
- Age at Death of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in subsequent family generation carrying the E200K mutation of the prion protein gene.PloS one · 2013Article
- Longitudinal analysis casts doubt on the presence of genetic anticipation in heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2012Article
- Bayesian modeling for genetic anticipation in presence of mutational heterogeneity: a case study in Lynch syndrome.Biometrics · 2011Article
- Anticipation in lynch syndrome: where we are where we go.Current genomics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anticipation, manifested through decreasing age of onset or increased severity in successive generations, has been noted in several genetic diseases. Statistical methods for genetic anticipation range from a simple use of the paired t-test for age of onset restricted to affected parent-child pairs to a recently proposed random effects model which includes extended pedigree data and unaffected family members [Larsen et al., 2009]. A naive use of the paired t-test is biased for the simple reason that age of onset has to be less than the age at ascertainment (interview) for both affected parent and child, and this right truncation effect is more pronounced in children than in parents. In this study, we first review different statistical methods for testing genetic anticipation in affected parent-child pairs that address the issue of bias due to right truncation. Using affected parent-child pair data, we compare the paired t-test with the parametric conditional maximum likelihood approach of Huang and Vieland [1997] and the nonparametric approach of Rabinowitz and Yang [1999] in terms of Type I error and power under various simulation settings and departures from the modeling assumptions. We especially investigate the issue of multiplex ascertainment and its effect on the different methods. We then focus on exploring genetic anticipation in Lynch syndrome and analyze new data on the age of onset in affected parent-child pairs from families seen at the University of Michigan Cancer Genetics clinic with a mutation in one of the three main mismatch repair (MMR) genes. In contrast to the clinic-based population, we re-analyze data on a population-based Lynch syndrome cohort, derived from the Danish HNPCC-register. Both datasets indicate evidence of genetic anticipation in Lynch syndrome. We then expand our review to incorporate recently proposed statistical methods that consider family instead of affected pairs as the sampling unit. These prospective censored regression models offer additional flexibility to incorporate unaffected family members, familial correlation and other covariates into the analysis. An expanded dataset from the Danish HNPCC-register is analyzed by this alternative set of methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.