Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20878446›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2011

Efficacy of protracted dose-dense temozolomide in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.

Ufuk Abacioglu, Hale B Caglar, Perran F Yumuk, Zuleyha Akgun, Beste M Atasoy, Meric Sengoz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00575887 (Efficacy of a Protracted Temozolomide Schedule in Patients With Progression After Standard Dose Temozolomide for High-grade Gliomas), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00575887 phase2completednot on this map

Efficacy of a Protracted Temozolomide Schedule in Patients With Progression After Standard Dose Temozolomide for High-grade Gliomas

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarmara UniversityRan2006 to 2009Enrolled25ConditionsGlioblastoma, Astrocytoma, Oligodendroglioma, Brain Tumor, RecurrentArmsTemozolomide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dose-dense temozolomide: is it still promising?Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ufuk AbaciogluRadiation Oncology Department, Marmara University Hospital, Tophanelioglu Cad. 13/15 Altunizade, 34660 Istanbul, Turkey. ufuk@abacioglu.com
Hale B Caglar
Perran F Yumuk
Zuleyha Akgun
Beste M Atasoy
Meric Sengoz
Marmara University · TRAcıbadem Adana Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current standard therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma is multimodal, comprising surgical resection plus radiotherapy and concurrent temozolomide, then adjuvant temozolomide for 6 months. This has been shown to provide survival benefits; however, the prognosis for these patients remains poor, and most relapse. The objective of this prospective Phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of protracted, dose-dense temozolomide therapy (100 mg/m(2) for 21 consecutive days of a 28-day cycle) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma or grade 3 gliomas who had previously received standard therapy. Of the 25 patients included (median age 50 years), 20 were evaluable for radiologic response. Two patients had partial responses and 10 had stable disease (60% overall clinical benefit); 8 patients (40%) progressed after the first treatment cycle. Five patients were not assessed for radiologic response due to early clinical progression but were included in the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. The median follow-up time was 7 months (range, 1-14 months). The median PFS was 3 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.8-4.2) and the median OS was 7 months (95% CI 5.1-8.9). The 6-month PFS rate (primary endpoint) was 17.3% (95% CI 1.7-32.2) and the 1-year OS rate was 12% (95% CI -1-25). This regimen was well tolerated. The most frequent adverse event was lymphopenia (grade 3-4 in 20 patients); no opportunistic infections were reported. Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 2 patients (grade 4 hepatic toxicity and thrombocytopenia). These data suggest that protracted, dose-dense temozolomide had modest activity with manageable toxicity in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma previously treated with temozolomide.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsDacarbazineDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTemozolomideAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID20878446
OpenAlexW2042299790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.