ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2010
[Updated results of a survey on outpatient healthcare structures in rheumatology].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Rheumatology in private practice: yesterday-today-tomorrow].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2021Review
- [ADAPTHERA-Statewide cross-sectoral care network for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis shows sustained remission in standard care].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2019Article
- [Survey of rheumatologists in Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt and Thuringia regarding the occupational situation and activities in further education: no way out of the undersupply of rheumatological care].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2019Article
- [Improvement of the diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected rheumatic disease by preselection in the early arthritis clinic : An alternative to the appointment service point model of the Healthcare Improvement Act].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2016Article
- [Outpatient rheumatologic treatment in Germany].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimthe aim of this study was to give an update on outpatient healthcare structures in rheumatology in Germany.
methodsa survey among the members of the German Association of Rheumatologists was carried out via a self-developed questionnaire, followed by a detailed descriptive and explorative statistical analysis. Contents of the questionnaire focussed on data concerning the practice, structure of the patients with regard to different indications and therapies, structure and quality of healthcare services provided, quality assurance and the economic situation of the practice as well as a subjective assessment of the outpatient healthcare environment. This approach is similar to the first survey conducted in 2005.
resultscompared to the findings from the first survey in 2005 no significant changes could be found in many areas. As this may intuitively sound disappointing it must be stated that high positive levels maintained in some areas, which cannot be taken for granted, can also be counted as success. With respect to the structure of services provided and medical therapies, a further upward trend could be observed. Topics which were assessed for the first time dealt with communication with healthcare insurers and teaching of rheumatology as a discipline in hospitals.
conclusionsrheumatologists in Germany offer a broad spectrum of different services and actively make use of quality assurance measures in the daily practice. The communication with general practitioners and the training of new rheumatologists in the future remain an area of concern and need to be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20878412What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.