ReviewMedizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983)2010
[Bisphosphonates in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer].
Review in Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For more than 10 years, based on the results with the bisphosphonate clodronic acid, it has been discussed, whether the occurrence of breast cancer metastases can be avoided or at least delayed by administration of bisphosphonates. The published results of recent studies applying, e.g., the bisphosphonates zoledronic and ibandronic acid, respectively, seem promising at first glance, especially, if the therapeutic acceptance of bisphosphonates in the indications osteoporosis and bone-related complications of malignancies, respectively, as well as their spectrum of side effects are taken into account and their putative mechanism of action is considered. There is a broad consensus that the existing data basis suffices to demonstrate importance of bisphosphonates in an adjuvant therapeutic setting of breast cancer. Significant relative risk reductions of, e.g., 36% in disease-free survival are very impressing and the corresponding absolute values of 3.2% are second-line communications. However, evaluation of all studies published so far according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine demonstrates many open questions and several methodical insufficiencies. Therefore, effectiveness and benefit of an adjuvant therapeutic application of bisphosphonates in breast cancer patients cannot be drawn out of evidence-based data. A recommendation of this therapy is given only by the German Working Pool of Gynecologic Oncology (AGO), but limited to study participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.