Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20878293›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2011

Tailored print communication and telephone motivational interviewing are equally successful in improving multiple lifestyle behaviors in a randomized controlled trial.

Hilde M van Keulen, Ilse Mesters, Marlein Ausems, Gerard van Breukelen, Marci Campbell, Ken Resnicow, Johannes Brug, Hein de Vries

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Innovative video tailoring for dietary change: final results of the Good for you! cluster randomized trial.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2015
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hilde M van KeulenDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. hilde.vankeulen@tno.nl
Ilse Mesters
Marlein Ausems
Gerard van Breukelen
Marci Campbell
Ken Resnicow
Johannes Brug
Hein de Vries
Maastricht University · NLEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputer tailoring and motivational interviewing show promise in promoting lifestyle change, despite few head-to-head comparative studies. PURPOSE: Vitalum is a randomized controlled trial in which the efficacy of these methods was compared in changing physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption in middle-aged Dutch adults.

methodsParticipants (n = 1,629) were recruited via 23 general practices and randomly received either four tailored print letters, four motivational telephone calls, two of each type of intervention, or no information. The primary outcomes were absolute change in self-reported physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption.

resultsAll three intervention groups (i.e., the tailored letters, the motivational calls, and the combined version) were equally and significantly more effective than the control group in increasing physical activity (hours/day), intake of fruit (servings/day), and consumption of vegetables (grams/day) from baseline to the intermediate measurement (week 25), follow-up 1 (week 47) and 2 (week 73). Effect sizes (Cohen's d) ranged from 0.15 to 0.18. Participants rated the interventions positively; interviews were more positively evaluated than letters.

conclusionsTailored print communication and telephone motivational interviewing or their combination are equally successful in changing multiple behaviors.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorLife StyleAgedEatingEducational StatusFemaleFruitHumansHypertensionInformation DisseminationInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityNetherlandsSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID20878293
PMCPMC3030742
OpenAlexW2152020633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.