Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20878268›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2010

RHO GTPase signaling for axon extension: is prenylation important?

Filsy Samuel, DiAnna L Hynds

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Targeting the Isoprenoid Biosynthetic Pathway in Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Interaction between Rho GTPases and 14-3-3 Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Filsy SamuelDepartment of Biology, Texas Woman's University, PO Box 425799, Denton, TX 46204-5799, USA.
DiAnna L Hynds
Texas Woman's University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many lines of evidence indicate the importance of the Rho family guanine nucleotide triphosphatases (GTPases) in directing axon extension and guidance. The signaling networks that involve these proteins regulate actin cytoskeletal dynamics in navigating neuronal growth cones. However, the intricate patterns that regulate Rho GTPase activation and signaling are not yet fully defined. Activity and subcellular localization of the Rho GTPases are regulated by post-translational modification. The addition of a geranylgeranyl group to the carboxy (C-) terminus targets Rho GTPases to the plasma membrane and promotes their activation by facilitating interaction with guanine nucleotide exchange factors and allowing sequestering by association with guanine dissociation inhibitors. However, it is unclear how these modifications affect neurite extension or how subcellular localization alters signaling from the classical Rho GTPases (RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42). Here, we review recent data addressing this issue and propose that Rho GTPase geranylgeranylation regulates outgrowth.

Indexed as

Protein PrenylationSignal TransductionActinsAnimalsAxonsGrowth ConesHumansrho GTP-Binding ProteinsActinsrho GTP-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20878268
OpenAlexW1985866954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.