ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2011
Assessing the impact of hepatitis C virus coinfection on lopinavir/ritonavir trough concentrations in HIV-infected patients.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Persistently elevated serum interleukin-6 predicts mortality among adults receiving combination antiretroviral therapy in Botswana: results from a clinical trial.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2013Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChronic hepatitis C is an emerging issue in the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease because both diseases have the same route of transmission, leading to a very high prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfection in the HIV-positive patient population. Lopinavir is extensively metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4, and the pharmacokinetics of this protease inhibitor (PI) could be influenced by liver impairment. However, data currently available on the impact of HCV-coinfection on lopinavir plasma concentrations are both limited and conflicting.
methodsThis was an observational, open-label study in which adult HIV-infected outpatients on stable antiretroviral treatment that included two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus lopinavir/ritonavir for at least 4 weeks were asked to participate. The trough plasma concentration (C (trough)) of lopinavir and ritonavir was assessed at steady state by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method.
resultsA total of 65 HIV-positive patients were enrolled in the study. These patients were stratified into two groups based on the absence/presence of HCV-coinfection: 45 were monoinfected (HIV+/HCV-) and 20 were coinfected (HIV+/HCV+). The lopinavir C (trough) in plasma was comparable between HIV+/HCV+ and HIV+/HCV- patients, without any statistically significant difference (geometric mean ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.61-1.42; p = 0.581). The mean ritonavir C (trough) was also comparable in the two groups. Almost all samples were found to be within the therapeutic plasma level range (97% in HIV+/HCV- group and 100% in HIV+/HCV+ group). No correlation was found between lopinavir plasma levels and adverse events (such as diarrhoea and hypertriglyceridaemia) or immune-virological parameters of HIV disease.
conclusionsAmong the HIV-positive patients participating in this study, the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir did not significantly change in those HIV-positive patients coinfected with HCV and in the absence of liver cirrhosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.