Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20876790›Full record

ArticleGenome research2010

Ancestral grass karyotype reconstruction unravels new mechanisms of genome shuffling as a source of plant evolution.

Florent Murat, Jian-Hong Xu, Eric Tannier, Michael Abrouk, Nicolas Guilhot, Caroline Pont, Joachim Messing, Jérôme Salse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A sorghum-anchored pan-grass syntenic gene set in grasses.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A genome assembly of decaploidHorticulture research · 2024
    Article
  15. Genome evolution of the ancient hexaploidProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Genome Variability in Artificial Allopolyploid Hybrids ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Subgenome-aware analyses reveal the genomic consequences of ancient allopolyploid hybridizations throughout the cotton family.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Chromosome-level genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Florent MuratINRA, UMR 1095, Laboratoire Génétique, Diversité et Ecophysiologie des Céréales, 63100 Clermont Ferrand, France.
Jian-Hong Xu
Eric Tannier
Michael Abrouk
Nicolas Guilhot
Caroline Pont
Joachim Messing
Jérôme Salse

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comparison of the chromosome numbers of today's species with common reconstructed paleo-ancestors has led to intense speculation of how chromosomes have been rearranged over time in mammals. However, similar studies in plants with respect to genome evolution as well as molecular mechanisms leading to mosaic synteny blocks have been lacking due to relevant examples of evolutionary zooms from genomic sequences. Such studies require genomes of species that belong to the same family but are diverged to fall into different subfamilies. Our most important crops belong to the family of the grasses, where a number of genomes have now been sequenced. Based on detailed paleogenomics, using inference from n = 5-12 grass ancestral karyotypes (AGKs) in terms of gene content and order, we delineated sequence intervals comprising a complete set of junction break points of orthologous regions from rice, maize, sorghum, and Brachypodium genomes, representing three different subfamilies and different polyploidization events. By focusing on these sequence intervals, we could show that the chromosome number variation/reduction from the n = 12 common paleo-ancestor was driven by nonrandom centric double-strand break repair events. It appeared that the centromeric/telomeric illegitimate recombination between nonhomologous chromosomes led to nested chromosome fusions (NCFs) and synteny break points (SBPs). When intervals comprising NCFs were compared in their structure, we concluded that SBPs (1) were meiotic recombination hotspots, (2) corresponded to high sequence turnover loci through repeat invasion, and (3) might be considered as hotspots of evolutionary novelty that could act as a reservoir for producing adaptive phenotypes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, PlantBrachypodiumChromosomes, PlantGenetic SpeciationKaryotypingModels, BiologicalOryzaPhylogenyPoaceaeRecombination, GeneticSorghumSyntenyZea mays

Identifiers

PMID20876790
PMCPMC2963818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.