Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20876500›Full record

Trial reportStroke2010

The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST): stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for carotid disease.

Vito A Mantese, Carlos H Timaran, David Chiu, Richard J Begg, Thomas G Brott, CREST Investigators

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stroke, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00004732 (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 104 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00004732 nacompletednot on this map

Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2000 to 2016Enrolled2,502ConditionsAtherosclerosis, Stroke, Carotid Stenosis, Cerebral InfarctionArmsCarotid Endarterectomy (CEA), Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Hyperacute stenting and angioplasty for acute extracranial non-tandem internal carotid artery strokes within the first 48 h: A 20-year experience and a systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Influence of carotid artery stenting on cognition of elderly patients with severe stenosis of the internal carotid artery.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014
    Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Device use trends in neuroendovascular procedures in the United States from 2015 to 2020.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vito A ManteseMayo Clinic, Griffin 3rd Floor, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224. brott.thomas@mayo.edu.
Carlos H Timaran
David Chiu
Richard J Begg
Thomas G Brott
CREST Investigators

Funding

Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting TrialR01NS038384 · NINDS · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BROTT, THOMAS G · 1999 to 2010
$40.7M
Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial: Long Term Follow-upU01NS038384 · NINDS · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BROTT, THOMAS G, SHEFFET, ALICE J · 2011 to 2016
$15.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038384NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS038384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCarotid artery stenosis causes up to 10% of all ischemic strokes. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was introduced as a treatment to prevent stroke in the early 1950s. Carotid stenting (CAS) was introduced as a treatment to prevent stroke in 1994.

methodsThe Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) is a randomized trial with blinded end point adjudication. Symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were randomized to CAS or CEA. The primary end point was the composite of any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during the periprocedural period and ipsilateral stroke thereafter, up to 4 years.

resultsThere was no significant difference in the rates of the primary end point between CAS and CEA (7.2% versus 6.8%; hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.51; P=0.51). Symptomatic status and sex did not modify the treatment effect, but an interaction with age and treatment was detected (P=0.02). Outcomes were slightly better after CAS for patients aged <70 years and better after CEA for patients aged >70 years. The periprocedural end point did not differ for CAS and CEA, but there were differences in the components, CAS versus CEA (stroke 4.1% versus 2.3%, P=0.012; and myocardial infarction 1.1% versus 2.3%, P=0.032).

conclusionsIn CREST, CAS and CEA had similar short- and longer-term outcomes. During the periprocedural period, there was higher risk of stroke with CAS and higher risk of myocardial infarction with CEA. Clinical Trial Registration-www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00004732.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCarotid StenosisEndarterectomy, CarotidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionProportional Hazards ModelsStentsStrokeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20876500
PMCPMC3058352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.