Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20876486›Full record

ReviewStroke2010

Targets for neural repair therapies after stroke.

S Thomas Carmichael

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Induces Neurorepair in the Ischemic Brain.Journal of neurology and experimental neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  7. A Role of Endogenous Progesterone in Stroke Cerebroprotection Revealed by the Neural-Specific Deletion of Its Intracellular Receptors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Critical role of the astrocyte for functional remodeling in contralateral hemisphere of somatosensory cortex after stroke.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Perisynaptic GABA Receptors The Overzealous Protector.Advances in pharmacological sciences · 2012
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S Thomas CarmichaelDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. scarmichael@mednet.ucla.edu

Funding

Mechanisms of Neuronal Regeneration after Stroke in a Novel Neurovascular NicheR01NS053957 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CARMICHAEL, STANLEY THOMAS · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
Mechanisms of Neural Repair in White Matter StrokeR01NS071481 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CARMICHAEL, STANLEY THOMAS · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Stroke Stem Cell/Hydrogel TherapyR21NS067692 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CARMICHAEL, STANLEY THOMAS · 2009 to 2010
$421k
NINDS NIH HHS NS53957NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS053957NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS071481NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS067692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of neural repair after stroke have developed from a relatively small number of laboratories doing highly creative discovery science to a field in which reproducible evidence supports distinct pathways, processes, and molecules that promote recovery. This review focuses on some emerging targets for neural repair or recovery in stroke and on their limitations.

Indexed as

AstrocytesHumansNeuronsRecovery of FunctionStroke

Identifiers

PMID20876486
PMCPMC2955885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.