ArticleInfection and immunity2010
Reproducible science.
Article in Infection and immunity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A checklist is associated with increased quality of reporting preclinical biomedical research: A systematic review.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Validating medical digital twins for clinical decision support: beyond predictive accuracy.JAMIA open · 2026Review
- Article
- Journals Operating Predatory Practices Are Systematically Eroding the Science Ethos: A Gate and Code Strategy to Minimise Their Operating Space and Restore Research Best Practice.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Article
- A procedure to harmonize the hydrodynamic force during microbial cultivation in shaking flasks.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2023Article
- Teaching students to R3eason, not merely to solve problem sets: The role of philosophy and visual data communication in accessible data science education.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Big Data in Gastroenterology Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- A Practical Guide to Reproducible Modeling for Biochemical Networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- The Top 100 Most Cited Articles Published in Dentistry: 2020 Update.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- PM4NGS, a project management framework for next-generation sequencing data analysis.GigaScience · 2021Article
- Lack of parent-of-origin effects in Nasonia jewel wasp: A replication and extension study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Open science, communal culture, and women's participation in the movement to improve science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Best Practices for Making Reproducible Biochemical Models.Cell systems · 2020Review
- Heat-KilledMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Towards reproducible computational drug discovery.Journal of cheminformatics · 2020Review
- Automation in the Life Science Research Laboratory.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Repeatability and reproducibility of prospective motion- and shim corrected 2D glycoCEST MRI.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019Article
- The use of chicken and insect infection models to assess the virulence of African Salmonella Typhimurium ST313.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reproducibility of an experimental result is a fundamental assumption in science. Yet, results that are merely confirmatory of previous findings are given low priority and can be difficult to publish. Furthermore, the complex and chaotic nature of biological systems imposes limitations on the replicability of scientific experiments. This essay explores the importance and limits of reproducibility in scientific manuscripts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.