Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20876085›Full record

SynthesisEvaluation & the health professions2011

Prevalence of the addictions: a problem of the majority or the minority?

Steve Sussman, Nadra Lisha, Mark Griffiths

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Evaluation & the health professions, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
21.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 588 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Workaholism Prevention in Occupational Medicine: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Addicted to love? Validity evidence for the Love Addiction Inventory - Brazilian version.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Steve SussmanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Alhambra, 91803, USA. ssussma@usc.edu
Nadra Lisha
Mark Griffiths
University of Southern California · USNottingham Trent University · GB

Funding

Drug Abuse Prevention for High Risk Emerging AdultsR01DA020138 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SUSSMAN, STEVEN Y · 2007 to 2011
$3.5M
NIDA NIH HHS DA020138NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of research studies over the last three decades suggest that a wide range of substance and process addictions may serve similar functions. The current article considers 11 such potential addictions (tobacco, alcohol, illicit drugs, eating, gambling, Internet, love, sex, exercise, work, and shopping), their prevalence, and co-occurrence, based on a systematic review of the literature. Data from 83 studies (each study n = at least 500 subjects) were presented and supplemented with small-scale data. Depending on which assumptions are made, overall 12-month prevalence of an addiction among U.S. adults varies from 15% to 61%. The authors assert that it is most plausible that 47% of the U.S. adult population suffers from maladaptive signs of an addictive disorder over a 12-month period and that it may be useful to think of addictions as due to problems of lifestyle as well as to person-level factors.

Indexed as

Minority GroupsAlcoholismBehavior, AddictiveGamblingHumansIllicit DrugsPrevalenceRisk FactorsSmokingSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesIllicit Drugs

Identifiers

PMID20876085
PMCPMC3134413
OpenAlexW2077358165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.