Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20875257›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2009

Relative impact of clinical evidence and over-the-counter prescribing on topical antibiotic use for acute infective conjunctivitis.

Helen Davis, David Mant, Caroline Scott, Daniel Lasserson, Peter W Rose

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Acute infective conjunctivitis in primary care: who needs antibiotics? An individual patient data meta-analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Pooled it
  3. Ocular Antibiotic Utilisation across Aotearoa/New Zealand.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Nursery sickness policies and their influence on prescribing for conjunctivitis: audit and questionnaire survey.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Systematic risks from chloramphenicol eye drops.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
  12. The future role of pharmacists in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Helen DavisDepartment of Primary Health Care, NIHR School of Primary Care Research, University of Oxford, Oxford.
David Mant
Caroline Scott
Daniel Lasserson
Peter W Rose

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute infective conjunctivitis is a common presentation in general practice. In 2005, three placebo-controlled clinical trials showed that use of topical antibiotics had a small effect on time to clinical resolution. In the same year, chloramphenicol eye drops were made available for sale over the counter.

aimTo compare the relative impact of clinical trial evidence and a change to over-the-counter availability on community use of topical chloramphenicol. DESIGN OF STUDY: Observational study using mainly routinely collected data for England.

settingNational prescribing data for England and local data from general practices in Oxfordshire, England.

methodData were collated from three sources: GP prescriptions from the Prescription Pricing Authority, wholesale supply to pharmacists from IMS Health, and an audit of delayed prescribing and non-prescribing from electronic consultation records for acute conjunctivitis, in four general practices.

resultsThe number of general practice prescriptions for topical chloramphenicol fell from 2.3 million in 2004 to 1.9 million in 2007, a reduction of 15.5%. In contrast, over-the-counter sales by pharmacists have increased steadily. The net effect of these changes has been a 47.8% increase in total chloramphenicol use during 2005-2007, with 1.1 million additional packs being used in 2007 compared to 2004.

conclusionMaking an antibiotic available over the counter increases its use substantially. This is in conflict with the important public health message that antibiotic use needs to be reduced to combat resistance. These findings support the views of the Chief Medical Officer that no more antibiotics should currently be made available over the counter.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, TopicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsChloramphenicolConjunctivitis, BacterialFamily PracticeHumansNonprescription DrugsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChloramphenicolNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID20875257
PMCPMC2784527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.