Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20873290›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Barriers to evidence-based decision making in public health: a national survey of chronic disease practitioners.

Julie A Jacobs, Elizabeth A Dodson, Elizabeth A Baker, Anjali D Deshpande, Ross C Brownson

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie A JacobsPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Saint Louis University School of Public Health, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Elizabeth A Dodson
Elizabeth A Baker
Anjali D Deshpande
Ross C Brownson
Washington University in St. Louis · USSaint Louis University · US

Funding

Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research Center*U48DP000060 · DP · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI BAKER, ELIZABETH A · 2004 to 2008
$6.1M
Understanding and Enhancing Dissemination Among US Chronic Disease PractitionersR18DP001139 · DP · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C · 2007 to 2008
$1.3M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 5R18DP001139-02NCCDPHP CDC HHS R18 DP001139NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP000060NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48/DP000060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExisting knowledge of evidence-based chronic disease prevention is not systematically disseminated or applied. This study investigated state and territorial chronic disease practitioners' self-reported barriers to evidence-based decision making (EBDM).

methodsIn a nationwide survey, participants indicated the extent to which they agreed with statements reflecting four personal and five organizational barriers to EBDM. Responses were measured on a Likert scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a larger barrier to EBDM. We analyzed mean levels of barriers and calculated adjusted odds ratios for barriers that were considered modifiable through interventions.

resultsOverall, survey participants (n=447) reported higher scores for organizational barriers than for personal barriers. The largest reported barriers to EBDM were lack of incentives/rewards, inadequate funding, a perception of state legislators not supporting evidence-based interventions and policies, and feeling the need to be an expert on many issues. In adjusted models, women were more likely to report a lack of skills in developing evidence-based programs and in communicating with policy makers. Participants with a bachelor's degree as their highest degree were more likely than those with public health master's degrees to report lacking skills in developing evidence-based programs. Men, specialists, and individuals with doctoral degrees were all more likely to feel the need to be an expert on many issues to effectively make evidence-based decisions.

conclusionsApproaches must be developed to address organizational barriers to EBDM. Focused skills development is needed to address personal barriers, particularly for chronic disease practitioners without graduate-level training.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEvidence-Based PracticeHealth Plan ImplementationPublic Health PracticeAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelChronic DiseaseClinical CompetenceEducational StatusFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrganizational PolicySocial Support

Identifiers

PMID20873290
PMCPMC2925010
OpenAlexW125348581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.