Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20871745›Full record

ArticleProteomics. Clinical applications2009

Tissue is alive: New technologies are needed to address the problems of protein biomarker pre-analytical variability.

Virginia Espina, Claudius Mueller, Kirsten Edmiston, Manuela Sciro, Emanuel F Petricoin, Lance A Liotta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteomics. Clinical applications, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Guidelines on antibody use in physiology research.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Fixation strategies for retinal immunohistochemistry.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2015
    Review
  15. Systems biology of neurodegenerative diseases.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2015
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Virginia EspinaGeorge Mason University, Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, Manassas, VA, USA.
Claudius Mueller
Kirsten Edmiston
Manuela Sciro
Emanuel F Petricoin
Lance A Liotta

Funding

Implementation of phosphoprotein preservation technology for cancer biospecimensR33CA157403 · NCI · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI LIOTTA, LANCE ALLEN · 2011 to 2013
$922k
Surrogate and Sentinal Technologies to Monitor Stability of Cancer PhosphoproteinR21CA125698 · NCI · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI LIOTTA, LANCE ALLEN · 2008 to 2009
$330k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA125698NCI NIH HHS R33 CA157403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instability of tissue protein biomarkers is a critical issue for molecular profiling. Pre-analytical variables during tissue procurement, such as time delays during which the tissue remains stored at room temperature, can cause significant variability and bias in downstream molecular analysis. Living tissue, ex vivo, goes through a defined stage of reactive changes that begin with oxidative, hypoxic and metabolic stress, and culminate in apoptosis. Depending on the delay time ex vivo, and reactive stage, protein biomarkers, such as signal pathway phosphoproteins will be elevated or suppressed in a manner which does not represent the biomarker levels at the time of excision. Proteomic data documenting reactive tissue protein changes post collection indicate the need to recognize and address tissue stability, preservation of post-translational modifications, and preservation of morphologic features for molecular analysis. Based on the analysis of phosphoproteins, one of the most labile tissue protein biomarkers, we set forth tissue procurement guidelines for clinical research. We propose technical solutions for (i) assessing the state of protein analyte preservation and specimen quality via identification of a panel of natural proteins (surrogate stability markers), and (ii) using multi-purpose fixative solution designed to stabilize, preserve and maintain proteins, nucleic acids, and tissue architecture.

Identifiers

PMID20871745
PMCPMC2944287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.