ArticleJournal of bacteriology2010
Resequencing the Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis K10 genome: improved annotation and revised genome sequence.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Selection of vaccine-candidate peptides fromFrontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- InvestigatingMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Characterization of early immune responses elicited by live and inactivated vaccines against Johne's disease in goats.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Evolutionary genomic and bacteria GWAS analysis ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021Article
- Complete Genome Sequence of OvineMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Genetic Diversity AmongFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Genotyping methods and molecular epidemiology ofInternational journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2018Review
- Identification ofCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2017Article
- Pathogenesis, Molecular Genetics, and Genomics ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2017Review
- Article
- Novel Single Nucleotide Polymorphism-Based Assay for Genotyping Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Phylogenomic exploration of the relationships between strains of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Genome-Wide Diversity and Phylogeography of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Canadian Dairy Cattle.PloS one · 2016Article
- Avian Mycobacteriosis: Still Existing Threat to Humans.BioMed research international · 2016Review
- Examination ofPeerJ · 2016Article
- Comprehensive insights in the Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis genome using new WGS data of sheep strain JIII-386 from Germany.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis and the influence of strain type on infection and pathogenesis: a review.Veterinary research · 2015Review
- Article
- Controlling Johne's disease: vaccination is the way forward.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the resequencing and revised annotation of the Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis K10 genome. A total of 90 single-nucleotide errors and a 51-bp indel in the original K10 genome were corrected, and the whole genome annotation was revised. Correction of these sequencing errors resulted in 28 frameshift alterations. The amended genome sequence is accessible via the supplemental section of study SRR060191 in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive and will serve as a valuable reference genome for future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.