Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20870402›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2010

Origin DNA melting and unwinding in DNA replication.

Dahai Gai, Y Paul Chang, Xiaojiang S Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Dynamic look at DNA unwinding by a replicative helicase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Quality control in the initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dahai GaiMolecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, 1050 Childs Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Y Paul Chang
Xiaojiang S Chen

Funding

SV40 T Antigen Structure and Helicase MechanismsR01AI055926 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHEN, XIAOJIANG S · 2004 to 2013
$4.0M
Structural Studies of MCM ComplexR01GM080338 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHEN, XIAOJIANG S · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI055926NIAID NIH HHS R01AI055926NIGMS NIH HHS GM080338NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic DNA replication is a necessary step in the life cycles of all organisms. To initiate DNA replication, the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) at the origin of replication must be separated or melted; this melted region is propagated and a mature replication fork is formed. To accomplish origin recognition, initial DNA melting, and the eventual formation of a replication fork, coordinated activity of initiators, helicases, and other cellular factors are required. In this review, we focus on recent advances in the structural and biochemical studies of the initiators and the replicative helicases in multiple replication systems, with emphasis on the systems in archaeal and eukaryotic cells. These studies have yielded insights into the plausible mechanisms of the early stages of DNA replication.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationNucleic Acid ConformationReplication OriginDNADNA HelicasesDNA, Single-StrandedNucleic Acid DenaturationDNADNA HelicasesDNA, Single-Stranded

Identifiers

PMID20870402
PMCPMC2997676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.