Trial reportLancet (London, England)2010
10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 255 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
255 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 914 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medical management and revascularization for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of non-statin Therapy on the Composition and Characteristics of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques: A Systematic Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review of intracranial atherosclerosis epidemiology-the largest contributor to the global ischemic stroke burden?Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- IL-6 and Surgical Outcomes in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Influences of age and gender on operative risks following carotid endarterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- [Important recommendations of the German-Austrian S3 guidelines on management of extracranial carotid artery stenosis].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022Guideline
- External Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Improve Selection of Patients for Carotid Endarterectomy.Stroke · 2022Pooled it
- Risk of stroke in relation to degree of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a population-based cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis.The Lancet. Neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison the effects of carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting for contralateral carotid occlusion.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up in Extracranial Carotid Stenosis.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020Pooled it
- Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Pooled it
- Carotid plaque magnetic resonance imaging and recurrent stroke risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of MRI for detecting intraplaque hemorrhage in the carotid arteries: a meta-analysis.European radiology · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Systematic review and network meta-analysis of treatment strategies for asymptomatic carotid disease.Scientific reports · 2018Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of the procedural risks of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting over time.The British journal of surgery · 2018Pooled it
- Long-term efficacy and safety of carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Treatment of carotid stenosis in asymptomatic, nonoctogenarian, standard risk patients with stenting versus endarterectomy trials.Journal of vascular surgery · 2022Trial
195 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIf carotid artery narrowing remains asymptomatic (ie, has caused no recent stroke or other neurological symptoms), successful carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces stroke incidence for some years. We assessed the long-term effects of successful CEA.
methodsBetween 1993 and 2003, 3120 asymptomatic patients from 126 centres in 30 countries were allocated equally, by blinded minimised randomisation, to immediate CEA (median delay 1 month, IQR 0·3-2·5) or to indefinite deferral of any carotid procedure, and were followed up until death or for a median among survivors of 9 years (IQR 6-11). The primary outcomes were perioperative mortality and morbidity (death or stroke within 30 days) and non-perioperative stroke. Kaplan-Meier percentages and logrank p values are from intention-to-treat analyses. This study is registered, number ISRCTN26156392.
findings1560 patients were allocated immediate CEA versus 1560 allocated deferral of any carotid procedure. The proportions operated on while still asymptomatic were 89·7% versus 4·8% at 1 year (and 92·1%vs 16·5% at 5 years). Perioperative risk of stroke or death within 30 days was 3·0% (95% CI 2·4-3·9; 26 non-disabling strokes plus 34 disabling or fatal perioperative events in 1979 CEAs). Excluding perioperative events and non-stroke mortality, stroke risks (immediate vs deferred CEA) were 4·1% versus 10·0% at 5 years (gain 5·9%, 95% CI 4·0-7·8) and 10·8% versus 16·9% at 10 years (gain 6·1%, 2·7-9·4); ratio of stroke incidence rates 0·54, 95% CI 0·43-0·68, p<0·0001. 62 versus 104 had a disabling or fatal stroke, and 37 versus 84 others had a non-disabling stroke. Combining perioperative events and strokes, net risks were 6·9% versus 10·9% at 5 years (gain 4·1%, 2·0-6·2) and 13·4% versus 17·9% at 10 years (gain 4·6%, 1·2-7·9). Medication was similar in both groups; throughout the study, most were on antithrombotic and antihypertensive therapy. Net benefits were significant both for those on lipid-lowering therapy and for those not, and both for men and for women up to 75 years of age at entry (although not for older patients).
interpretationSuccessful CEA for asymptomatic patients younger than 75 years of age reduces 10-year stroke risks. Half this reduction is in disabling or fatal strokes. Net benefit in future patients will depend on their risks from unoperated carotid lesions (which will be reduced by medication), on future surgical risks (which might differ from those in trials), and on whether life expectancy exceeds 10 years.
fundingUK Medical Research Council, BUPA Foundation, Stroke Association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.