Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20869868›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2010

Imaging cellular architecture with X-rays.

Carolyn A Larabell, Keith A Nugent

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Quantitative, in situ visualization of intracellular insulin vesicles in pancreatic beta cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carolyn A LarabellDepartment of Anatomy, University of California at San Francisco, 1550 4th Street, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Carolyn.Larabell@ucsf.edu
Keith A Nugent

Funding

VIRUS-INDUCED STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS OF NUCLEUSP41RR019664 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LARABELL, CAROLYN A · 2004 to 2011
$8.2M
3-D Localization of Molecules Using X-Ray TomographyR01GM070445 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LARABELL, CAROLYN A · 2004 to 2008
$1.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR019664NCRR NIH HHS RR019664NIGMS NIH HHS GM070445NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray imaging of biological samples is progressing rapidly. In this paper we review the progress to date in high-resolution imaging of cellular architecture. In particular we survey the progress in soft X-ray tomography and argue that the field is coming of age and that important biological insights are starting to emerge. We then review the new ideas based on coherent diffraction. These methods are at a much earlier stage of development but, as they eliminate the need for X-ray optics, have the capacity to provide substantially better spatial resolution than zone plate-based methods.

Indexed as

CellsHumansMicroscopyMolecular ImagingTomography, X-RayX-Ray DiffractionX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID20869868
PMCPMC3268817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.