ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010
MultiRTA: a simple yet reliable method for predicting peptide binding affinities for multiple class II MHC allotypes.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-driven neoantigen identification: a comprehensive review from somatic variant calling to T cell recognition.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Strategies for neoantigen screening and immunogenicity validation in cancer immunotherapy (Review).International journal of oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- Neoantigen-specific TCR-T cell-based immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2022Review
- Multiple-Allele MHC Class II Epitope Engineering by a Molecular Dynamics-Based Evolution Protocol.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Deimmunization of protein therapeutics - Recent advances in experimental and computational epitope prediction and deletion.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Article
- Immunoinformatics: Predicting Peptide-MHC Binding.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2020Article
- T Cell Epitope Predictions.Annual review of immunology · 2020Review
- Integration of Omics Data Sources to Inform Mechanistic Modeling of Immune-Oncology Therapies: A Tutorial for Clinical Pharmacologists.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2020Review
- Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility.Genome medicine · 2019Review
- Predicting Antigenicity of Influenza A Viruses Using biophysical ideas.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Trans-Allelic Model for Prediction of Peptide:MHC-II Interactions.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Article
- A Novel Peptide Binding Prediction Approach for HLA-DR Molecule Based on Sequence and Structural Information.BioMed research international · 2016Article
- Development and validation of an epitope prediction tool for swine (PigMatrix) based on the pocket profile method.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Learning sequence determinants of protein:protein interaction specificity with sparse graphical models.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2015Article
- Immunogenic peptide discovery in cancer genomes.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2015Review
- MHC2MIL: a novel multiple instance learning based method for MHC-II peptide binding prediction by considering peptide flanking region and residue positions.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Learning Sequence Determinants of Protein:protein Interaction Specificity with Sparse Graphical Models.Research in computational molecular biology : ... Annual International Conference, RECOMB ... : proceedings. RECOMB (Conference : 2005- ) · 2014Article
- An effective and effecient peptide binding prediction approach for a broad set of HLA-DR molecules based on ordered weighted averaging of binding pocket profiles.Proteome science · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe binding of peptide fragments of antigens to class II MHC is a crucial step in initiating a helper T cell immune response. The identification of such peptide epitopes has potential applications in vaccine design and in better understanding autoimmune diseases and allergies. However, comprehensive experimental determination of peptide-MHC binding affinities is infeasible due to MHC diversity and the large number of possible peptide sequences. Computational methods trained on the limited experimental binding data can address this challenge. We present the MultiRTA method, an extension of our previous single-type RTA prediction method, which allows the prediction of peptide binding affinities for multiple MHC allotypes not used to train the model. Thus predictions can be made for many MHC allotypes for which experimental binding data is unavailable.
resultsWe fit MultiRTA models for both HLA-DR and HLA-DP using large experimental binding data sets. The performance in predicting binding affinities for novel MHC allotypes, not in the training set, was tested in two different ways. First, we performed leave-one-allele-out cross-validation, in which predictions are made for one allotype using a model fit to binding data for the remaining MHC allotypes. Comparison of the HLA-DR results with those of two other prediction methods applied to the same data sets showed that MultiRTA achieved performance comparable to NetMHCIIpan and better than the earlier TEPITOPE method. We also directly tested model transferability by making leave-one-allele-out predictions for additional experimentally characterized sets of overlapping peptide epitopes binding to multiple MHC allotypes. In addition, we determined the applicability of prediction methods like MultiRTA to other MHC allotypes by examining the degree of MHC variation accounted for in the training set. An examination of predictions for the promiscuous binding CLIP peptide revealed variations in binding affinity among alleles as well as potentially distinct binding registers for HLA-DR and HLA-DP. Finally, we analyzed the optimal MultiRTA parameters to discover the most important peptide residues for promiscuous and allele-specific binding to HLA-DR and HLA-DP allotypes.
conclusionsThe MultiRTA method yields competitive performance but with a significantly simpler and physically interpretable model compared with previous prediction methods. A MultiRTA prediction webserver is available at http://bordnerlab.org/MultiRTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.