Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20868487›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2010

Dynamic instability of genomic methylation patterns in pluripotent stem cells.

Steen Kt Ooi, Daniel Wolf, Odelya Hartung, Suneet Agarwal, George Q Daley, Stephen P Goff, Timothy H Bestor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cdk8 and Hira mutations trigger X chromosome elimination in naive female hybrid mouse embryonic stem cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Methylation-directed glycosylation of chromatin factors represses retrotransposon promoters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Steen Kt OoiDepartment of Genetics and Development, Columbia University, New York, USA. thb12@columbia.edu.
Daniel Wolf
Odelya Hartung
Suneet Agarwal
George Q Daley
Stephen P Goff
Timothy H Bestor
Columbia University · USBoston Children's Hospital · USBoston Children's Museum · US

Funding

Molecular mechanisms of nuclear reprogrammingK08HL089150 · NHLBI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI AGARWAL, SUNEET · 2008 to 2012
$662k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL089150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic methylation patterns are established during gametogenesis, and perpetuated in somatic cells by faithful maintenance methylation. There have been previous indications that genomic methylation patterns may be less stable in embryonic stem (ES) cells than in differentiated somatic cells, but it is not known whether different mechanisms of de novo and maintenance methylation operate in pluripotent stem cells compared with differentiating somatic cells.

resultsIn this paper, we show that ablation of the DNA methyltransferase regulator DNMT3L (DNA methyltransferase 3-like) in mouse ES cells renders them essentially incapable of de novo methylation of newly integrated retroviral DNA. We also show that ES cells lacking DNMT3L lose DNA methylation over time in culture, suggesting that DNA methylation in ES cells is the result of dynamic loss and gain of DNA methylation. We found that wild-type female ES cells lose DNA methylation at a much faster rate than do male ES cells; this defect could not be attributed to sex-specific differences in expression of DNMT3L or of any DNA methyltransferase. We also found that human ES and induced pluripotent stem cell lines showed marked but variable loss of methylation that could not be attributed to sex chromosome constitution or time in culture.

conclusionsThese data indicate that DNA methylation in pluripotent stem cells is much more dynamic and error-prone than is maintenance methylation in differentiated cells. DNA methylation requires DNMT3L in stem cells, but DNMT3L is not expressed in differentiating somatic cells. Error-prone maintenance methylation will introduce unpredictable phenotypic variation into clonal populations of pluripotent stem cells, and this variation is likely to be much more pronounced in cultured female cells. This epigenetic variability has obvious negative implications for the clinical applications of stem cells.

Identifiers

PMID20868487
PMCPMC2954997
OpenAlexW2079562528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.