Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20868458›Full record

Trial reportBipolar disorders2010

Double-blind randomized trial of risperidone versus divalproex in pediatric bipolar disorder.

Mani N Pavuluri, David B Henry, Robert L Findling, Stephanie Parnes, Julie A Carbray, Tahseen Mohammed, Philip G Janicak, John A Sweeney

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bipolar disorders, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Valproate for acute mania.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Medication Adherence Among Adolescents with Bipolar Disorder.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mani N PavuluriDepartment of Psychiatry, Institute for Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA. mpavuluri@psych.uic.edu
David B Henry
Robert L Findling
Stephanie Parnes
Julie A Carbray
Tahseen Mohammed
Philip G Janicak
John A Sweeney
Youth Development · USCase Western Reserve University · USJuvenile Protective Association · USRush University Medical Center · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

WOMEN'S INTERAGENCY HIV STUDY (WIHS) ANTIRETROVIRAL TREATMENT EXPOSURE/INTENSIVEM01RR013987 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI GOLDMAN, MORRIS BENJAMIN · 2000 to 2004
$9.2M
Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development AwardK23RR018638 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI PAVULURI, MANI N · 2003 to 2007
$737k
NCRR NIH HHS 1 K23 RR018638-01NCRR NIH HHS K23 RR018638NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR013987NCRR NIH HHS MO1-RR-13987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the relative effects of risperidone and divalproex in pediatric mania.

methodsThis is a double-blind, randomized, outpatient clinical trial with 66 children and adolescents (mean age= 10.9 ± 3.3 years; age range= 8-18 years) with mania who were randomly assigned to either risperidone (0.5-2 mg/day, n= 33) or divalproex (60-120 μg/mL, n= 33) for a six-week period. Measures included the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R).

resultsMixed-effects regression models, with interaction between time and the active drug as predictors, found that the risperidone group had more rapid improvement than the divalproex group (p < 0.05), although final scores did not differ significantly between groups. Mixed models using only those subjects who completed the six-week study found similar results. The response rate on YMRS was 78.1% for risperidone and 45.5% for divalproex (p < 0.01). The remission rate for risperidone was 62.5%, compared with 33.3% for divalproex (p < 0.05). Improvement on the CDRS-R was significantly higher for the risperidone group relative to the divalproex group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups in safety, but subject retention was significantly higher at study endpoint in the risperidone group (p < 0.01). Dropout rate was 24% in the risperidone group and 48% in the divalproex group, with increased irritability being the most common reason for dropout in the latter. There was no significant weight gain in either group.

conclusionResults suggest that risperidone was associated with more rapid improvement and greater reduction in manic symptoms compared to divalproex. Although the results suggest that both drugs are safe, risperidone's lower attrition rate and lower rate of adverse events may suggest better toleration. Clinical trials with larger samples are required to confirm these preliminary findings.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntimanic AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderChildDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleOutpatientsRisperidoneTreatment OutcomeValproic AcidAntimanic AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsRisperidoneValproic Acid

Identifiers

PMID20868458
PMCPMC3013630
OpenAlexW1806796280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.