Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20867071›Full record

ArticlePhysical review letters2010

Streaming instability in growing cell populations.

William Mather, Octavio Mondragón-Palomino, Tal Danino, Jeff Hasty, Lev S Tsimring

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review letters, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Impact of crowding on the diversity of expanding populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Population genetics in microchannels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. How tissue fluidity influences brain tumor progression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Moran Model of Spatial Alignment in Microbial Colonies.Physica D. Nonlinear phenomena · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William MatherDepartment of Bioengineering, UCSD, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, California 92093-0412, USA.
Octavio Mondragón-Palomino
Tal Danino
Jeff Hasty
Lev S Tsimring
La Jolla Bioengineering Institute · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Engineered Gene Circuits for Basic Science and BiotechnologyR01GM069811 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HASTY, JEFF M, TSIMRING, LEV S · 2004 to 2025
$13.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flows of cells growing as a quasimonolayer in a confined space can exhibit streaming, with narrow streams of fast-moving cells flowing around clusters of slowly moving cells. We observed and analyzed this phenomenon experimentally for E. coli bacteria proliferating in a microfluidic cell trap using time-lapse microscopy. We also performed continuum modeling and discrete-element simulations to elucidate the mechanism behind the streaming instability. Our analysis demonstrates that streaming can be explained by the interplay between the slow adaptation of a cell to its local microenvironment and its mobility due to changes of cell-substrate contact forces.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCell ProliferationEscherichia coliHydrodynamicsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicroscopyTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20867071
PMCPMC2947335
OpenAlexW2031857125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.