Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20865445›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2011

Return-to-work self-efficacy: development and validation of a scale in claimants with musculoskeletal disorders.

Sandra Brouwer, Renée-Louise Franche, Sheilah Hogg-Johnson, Hyunmi Lee, Niklas Krause, William S Shaw

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03088969 (Validation of the French Version of the Questionnaires of Self-efficacy Received From the People With a Chronic Low Back Pain After Return to the Work), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03088969 completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Validation of the French Version of the Questionnaires of Self-efficacy Received From the People With a Chronic Low Back Pain After Return to the Work (10 and 19 Items)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRan2016 to 2018Enrolled70ConditionsChronic Low Back PainArmsquestionnaire RTWSE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Fewer Opioid Pills After Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery Maintain Perceived Pain and Return-To-Work Self-Efficacy.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sandra BrouwerDepartment of Health Sciences, Work & Health, University Medical Center Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan, The Netherlands. sandra.brouwer@med.umcg.nl
Renée-Louise Franche
Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Hyunmi Lee
Niklas Krause
William S Shaw

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION We report on the development and validation of a 10-item scale assessing self-efficacy within the return-to-work context, the Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy (RTWSE) scale. METHODS Lost-time claimants completed a telephone survey 1 month (n = 632) and 6 months (n = 446) after a work-related musculoskeletal injury. Exploratory (Varimax and Promax rotation) and confirmatory factor analyses of self-efficacy items were conducted with two separate subsamples at both time points. Construct validity was examined by comparing scale measurements and theoretically derived constructs, and the phase specificity of RTWSE was studied by examining changes in strength of relationships between the RTWSE Subscales and the other constructs at both time measures. RESULTS Factor analyses supported three underlying factors: (1) Obtaining help from supervisor, (2) Coping with pain (3) Obtaining help from co-workers. Internal consistency (alpha) for the three subscales ranged from 0.66 to 0.93. The total variance explained was 68% at 1-month follow-up and 76% at 6-month follow-up. Confirmatory factor analyses had satisfactory fit indices to confirm the initial model. With regard to construct validity: relationships of RTWSE with depressive symptoms, fear-avoidance, pain, and general health, were generally in the hypothesized direction. However, the hypothesis that less advanced stages of change on the Readiness for RTW scale would be associated with lower RTWSE could not be completely confirmed: on all RTWSE subscales, RTWSE decreased significantly for a subset of participants who started working again. Moreover, only Pain RTWSE was significantly associated with RTW status and duration of work disability. With regard to the phase specificity, the strength of association between RTWSE and other constructs was stronger at 6 months post-injury compared to 1 month post-injury. CONCLUSIONS A final 10-item version of the RTWSE has adequate internal consistency and validity to assess the confidence of injured workers to obtain help from supervisor and co-workers and to cope with pain. With regard to phase specificity, stronger associations between RTWSE and other constructs at 6-month follow-up suggest that the association between these psychological constructs consolidates over time after the disruptive event of the injury.

Indexed as

Self EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesWork Capacity EvaluationFactor Analysis, StatisticalHealth Status IndicatorsHumansMusculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational DiseasesPatient ParticipationReproducibility of ResultsWorkers' Compensation

Identifiers

PMID20865445
PMCPMC3098360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.