Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20864808›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines2010

An HIV-1 clade A/E DNA prime, recombinant fowlpox virus boost vaccine is safe, but non-immunogenic in a randomized phase I/IIa trial in Thai volunteers at low risk of HIV infection.

Atchriya Hemachandra, Rebekah L Puls, Sunee Sirivichayakul, Stephen Kerr, Pattarawat Thantiworasit, Sasiwimol Ubolyam, David A Cooper, Sean Emery, Praphan Phanuphak, Anthony Kelleher and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00333424 (A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase I Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Candidate Prophylactic pHIS-HIV-AE DNA Prime and rFPV-HIV-AE Boost HIV Vaccination Strategy), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00333424 phase1 / phase2terminatednot on this map

A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase I Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Candidate Prophylactic pHIS-HIV-AE DNA Prime and rFPV-HIV-AE Boost HIV Vaccination Strategy

TypeinterventionalSponsorKirby InstituteRan2007 to 2009Enrolled8ConditionsHIVArmspHIS-HIV-AE (DNA vaccine) prime and rFPV-HIV-AE (recombinant fowlpox virus boost) vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Poxvirus vectors as HIV/AIDS vaccines in humans.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2012
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Atchriya HemachandraHIV-NAT, Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rebekah L Puls
Sunee Sirivichayakul
Stephen Kerr
Pattarawat Thantiworasit
Sasiwimol Ubolyam
David A Cooper
Sean Emery
Praphan Phanuphak
Anthony Kelleher
Kiat Ruxrungtham
HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration · THChulalongkorn University · THUNSW Sydney · AUNational Centre for Clinical Research on Emerging Drugs · AU

Funding

HIV Vaccine Design and Development Teams-26605395N01AI005395 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES · 2000 to 2004
$3.2M
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI005395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreviously demonstrated safe and highly immunogenic in non-human primates, this study assessed DNA (pHIS-HIV-AE) prime, recombinant fowlpox (rFPV-HIV-AE) boost vaccines in humans.

resultsEight participants (6 active vaccine, 2 placebo) received all vaccinations; local and systemic reactions were mild to moderate. The percentage CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells responding to HIV-1 Gag antigens by ICS (mean ± SD) was 0.16 ± 0.12 and 0.10 ± 0.12 for active and 0.01 ± 0.01 and 0.00 ± 0.00 for placebo vaccine respectively. The percentage of T cells responding did not reach pre-defined thresholds to be considered positive responses. Consequently, the Data Safety Monitoring Board recommended cessation of further recruitment. Existing volunteers were followed to 52 weeks.

methodsVectors expressing homologous HIV-1 clade A/E gag, pol, env and regulatory genes or matched placebo were administered intramuscularly at weeks 0, 4, 8 (6 mg pHIS-HIV-AE) and week 12 (3.0 x 10(8) pfu rFPV-HIV-AE) in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I/IIa study in healthy Thai adults at low risk of HIV infection. Immunogenicity was determined by interferon-gamma and IL-2 expression using intracellular cytokine staining assay (ICS), 13 weeks after randomization. Interim analysis was performed when eight volunteers reached 16 weeks follow-up.

conclusionsVaccine candidates were generally well tolerated, but showed limited immunogenicity. Better vaccines and delivery systems are required.

Indexed as

AdultAIDS VaccinesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCytokinesDouble-Blind MethodDrug CarriersFemaleFowlpox virusGenetic VectorsHIV-1HIV InfectionsHuman ExperimentationHumansImmunizationImmunization, SecondaryAIDS VaccinesCytokinesDrug CarriersPlacebosVaccines, DNAVaccines, SubunitVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID20864808
PMCPMC3322532
OpenAlexW2070456312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.