Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20864156›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2011

Characterization of the degradation mechanisms of lysine-derived aliphatic poly(ester urethane) scaffolds.

Andrea E Hafeman, Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz, Angela L Zachman, Hak-Joon Sung, Lillian B Nanney, Jeffrey M Davidson, Scott A Guelcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Degradable polymer bone adhesives.Fundamental research · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Design Challenges in Polymeric Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea E HafemanDepartment of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz
Angela L Zachman
Hak-Joon Sung
Lillian B Nanney
Jeffrey M Davidson
Scott A Guelcher
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Skin Regeneration with Stem Cells and ScaffoldsR01AR056138 · NIAMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIDSON, JEFFREY M., GUELCHER, SCOTT A · 2009 to 2013
$3.3M
ELASTIN AND COLLAGEN IN THE AGING PROCESSR01AG006528 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIDSON, JEFFREY M. · 1986 to 2011
$2.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR056138NIAMS NIH HHS AR41493NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056138NIA NIH HHS AG06528NIA NIH HHS R01 AG006528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterization of the degradation mechanism of polymeric scaffolds and delivery systems for regenerative medicine is essential to assess their clinical applicability. Key performance criteria include induction of a minimal, transient inflammatory response and controlled degradation to soluble non-cytotoxic breakdown products that are cleared from the body by physiological processes. Scaffolds fabricated from biodegradable poly(ester urethane)s (PEURs) undergo controlled degradation to non-cytotoxic breakdown products and support the ingrowth of new tissue in preclinical models of tissue regeneration. While previous studies have shown that PEUR scaffolds prepared from lysine-derived polyisocyanates degrade faster under in vivo compared to in vitro conditions, the degradation mechanism is not well understood. In this study, we have shown that PEUR scaffolds prepared from lysine triisocyanate (LTI) or a trimer of hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDIt) undergo hydrolytic, esterolytic, and oxidative degradation. Hydrolysis of ester bonds to yield α-hydroxy acids is the dominant mechanism in buffer, and esterolytic media modestly increase the degradation rate. While HDIt scaffolds show a modest (<20%) increase in degradation rate in oxidative medium, LTI scaffolds degrade six times faster in oxidative medium. Furthermore, the in vitro rate of degradation of LTI scaffolds in oxidative medium approximates the in vivo rate in rat excisional wounds, and histological sections show macrophages expressing myeloperoxidase at the material surface. While recent preclinical studies have underscored the potential of injectable PEUR scaffolds and delivery systems for tissue regeneration, this promising class of biomaterials has a limited regulatory history. Elucidation of the macrophage-mediated oxidative mechanism by which LTI scaffolds degrade in vivo provides key insights into the ultimate fate of these materials when injected into the body.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell LineLysineMaleMaterials TestingMechanicsMiceMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPolyestersPolyurethanesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsWound HealingBiocompatible MaterialsLysinemicrothane foamPolyestersPolyurethanes

Identifiers

PMID20864156
PMCPMC2997347
OpenAlexW2085375087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.