Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20863759›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2010

Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial.

David N Krag, Stewart J Anderson, Thomas B Julian, Ann M Brown, Seth P Harlow, Joseph P Costantino, Takamaru Ashikaga, Donald L Weaver, Eleftherios P Mamounas, Lynne M Jalovec and 5 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 697 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
697citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
33.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00003830 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Phase III Clinical Trial to Compare Sentinel Node Resection to Conventional Axillary Dissection in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorNSABP Foundation IncRan1999 to 2014Enrolled5,611ConditionsBreast CancerArmsconventional surgery, Sentinel node resection followed by node examination
NCT03939598 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of Preoperative Tattooing of Percutaneously Biopsied Axillary Lymph Node: A Quasi Experimental Pilot Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAga Khan UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled40ConditionsBreast Neoplasm
NCT04671511 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Sentinel Node Biopsy and Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients With Clinically Negative Axilla

TypeinterventionalSponsorJewish General HospitalRan2021 to 2026Enrolled98ConditionsBreast Cancer Female, Early-stage Breast Cancer, Lymph Node Metastases, Axillary MetastasesArmsTargeted Axillary Dissection, Ultrasound of the axilla
NCT06412211 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Utility of Photoacoustic Finder in Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Breast Cancer - Pilot Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSeoul St. Mary's HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled129ConditionsSentinel Lymph Node, Breast CancerArmsPhotoacoustic finder
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

697 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,892 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DEGRO practical guidelines: radiotherapy of breast cancer-regional nodal irradiation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. De-escalation of breast surgery for early stage breast cancer.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

637 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

David N KragNational Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA. david.krag@uvm.edu
Stewart J Anderson
Thomas B Julian
Ann M Brown
Seth P Harlow
Joseph P Costantino
Takamaru Ashikaga
Donald L Weaver
Eleftherios P Mamounas
Lynne M Jalovec
Thomas G Frazier
R Dirk Noyes
André Robidoux
Hugh Mc Scarth
Norman Wolmark
NSABP Foundation · USAultman Hospital · USCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAIntermountain Healthcare · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

PRIMARY CANCER THERAPY GROUP--NSABP (HEADQUARTERS)U10CA012027 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 1985 to 2012
$117.2M
NSABP Foreign AccrualsU10CA037377 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 1985 to 2014
$116.5M
STUDY TO ASSESS RALOXIFENE FOR PREVENTING BREAST CANCERU10CA069974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COSTANTINO, JOSEPH P. · 1995 to 2013
$62.4M
PRIMARY BREAST CANCER THERAPY--BIOSTATISTICS CENTERU10CA069651 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COSTANTINO, JOSEPH P. · 1995 to 2012
$52.1M
TUMOR GROWTH AND METASTASISP30CA022435 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI FOGARTY, JOHN P · 1985 to 2007
$9.6M
Sentinel Node Versus Axillary Dissection in Breast CancerR01CA074137 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI KRAG, DAVID N · 2005 to 2012
$5.2M
PRIMARY BREAST CANCER THERAPY GROUP--NSABPU10CA044066 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL HOSPITAL · PI ROBIDOUX, ANDRE · 1987 to 2012
$176k
NCI NIH HHS 10 CA44066NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA074137NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022435NCI NIH HHS P30 CA22435NCI NIH HHS R01 CA074137NCI NIH HHS U10 CA012027NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037377NCI NIH HHS U10 CA044066NCI NIH HHS U10 CA069651NCI NIH HHS U10 CA069974NCI NIH HHS U10CA-12027NCI NIH HHS U10CA-37377NCI NIH HHS U10CA-69651NCI NIH HHS U10CA-69974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSentinel-lymph-node (SLN) surgery was designed to minimise the side-effects of lymph-node surgery but still offer outcomes equivalent to axillary-lymph-node dissection (ALND). The aims of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trial B-32 were to establish whether SLN resection in patients with breast cancer achieves the same survival and regional control as ALND, but with fewer side-effects.

methodsNSABP B-32 was a randomised controlled phase 3 trial done at 80 centres in Canada and the USA between May 1, 1999, and Feb 29, 2004. Women with invasive breast cancer were randomly assigned to either SLN resection plus ALND (group 1) or to SLN resection alone with ALND only if the SLNs were positive (group 2). Random assignment was done at the NSABP Biostatistical Center (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) with a biased coin minimisation approach in an allocation ratio of 1:1. Stratification variables were age at entry (≤ 49 years, ≥ 50 years), clinical tumour size (≤ 2·0 cm, 2·1-4·0 cm, ≥ 4·1 cm), and surgical plan (lumpectomy, mastectomy). SLN resection was done with a blue dye and radioactive tracer. Outcome analyses were done in patients who were assessed as having pathologically negative sentinel nodes and for whom follow-up data were available. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. All deaths, irrespective of cause, were included. The mean time on study for the SLN-negative patients with follow-up information was 95·6 months (range 70·1-126·7). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00003830.

findings5611 women were randomly assigned to the treatment groups, 3989 had pathologically negative SLN. 309 deaths were reported in the 3986 SLN-negative patients with follow-up information: 140 of 1975 patients in group 1 and 169 of 2011 in group 2. Log-rank comparison of overall survival in groups 1 and 2 yielded an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1·20 (95% CI 0·96-1·50; p=0·12). 8-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival were 91·8% (95% CI 90·4-93·3) in group 1 and 90·3% (88·8-91·8) in group 2. Treatment comparisons for disease-free survival yielded an unadjusted HR of 1·05 (95% CI 0·90-1·22; p=0·54). 8-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for disease-free survival were 82·4% (80·5-84·4) in group 1 and 81·5% (79·6-83·4) in group 2. There were eight regional-node recurrences as first events in group 1 and 14 in group 2 (p=0·22). Patients are continuing follow-up for longer-term assessment of survival and regional control. The most common adverse events were allergic reactions, mostly related to the administration of the blue dye.

interpretationOverall survival, disease-free survival, and regional control were statistically equivalent between groups. When the SLN is negative, SLN surgery alone with no further ALND is an appropriate, safe, and effective therapy for breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes.

fundingUS Public Health Service, National Cancer Institute, and Department of Health and Human Services.

Indexed as

Mastectomy, Modified RadicalMastectomy, SegmentalSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAxillaBreast NeoplasmsCanadaChemotherapy, AdjuvantColoring AgentsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalColoring Agentsiso-sulfan blueRadiopharmaceuticalsRosaniline DyesTechnetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid

Identifiers

PMID20863759
PMCPMC3041644
OpenAlexW2131719808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.