Trial reportNutrition journal2010
Efficacy of different strategies to treat anemia in children: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Nutrition journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00822380 (Evaluation of the Efficacy of Different Strategies to Treat Anemia in Mexican Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Different Strategies to Treat Anemia in Mexican Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prevalence of Anemia among Children and Adolescents of Bangladesh: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Food fortification with multiple micronutrients: impact on health outcomes in general population.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Fortification of staple foods with vitamin A for vitamin A deficiency.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Adherence to and acceptability of home fortification with vitamins and minerals in children aged 6 to 23 months: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2016Pooled it
- A short-term intervention of ingesting iron along with methionine and threonine leads to a higher hemoglobin level than that with iron alone in young healthy women: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, comparative study.European journal of nutrition · 2023Trial
- The effect of folic acid supplementation with ferrous sulfate on the linear and ponderal growth of children aged 6-24 months: a randomized controlled trial.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2015Trial
- Value for health: how fortified infant cereals provide cost-effective solutions to iron deficiency anaemia in Egypt.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Efficacy of vitamin C with Fe supplementation in patients with iron deficiency anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2024Review
- Article
- Perceived performances of peer learning and education approach on malaria prevention through primary schools communities in rural Ethiopia: Peer educators' perspectives.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Acceptability of home fortification with multiple micro-nutrients among Sri Lankan children.PloS one · 2021Article
- Micronutrient powder use in Arequipa, Peru: Barriers and enablers across multiple levels.Maternal & child nutrition · 2020Article
- Predictors of micronutrient powder sachet coverage and recent intake among children 12-23 months in Eastern Uganda.Maternal & child nutrition · 2019Article
- Article
- The Influence of Malnutrition and Micronutrient Status on Anemic Risk in Children under 3 Years Old in Poor Areas in China.PloS one · 2015Article
- Anaemia among school children older than five years in the Volta Region of Ghana.The Pan African medical journal · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnemia continues to be a major public health problem among children in many regions of the world, and it is still not clear which strategy to treat it is most effective.
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and children's acceptance of several recognized strategies to treat anemia.
methodsNon-breastfed children (n = 577), 6 to 43 mo of age, were screened for the trial; 267 were anemic (hemoglobin < 11.7 g/dL), and 266 of those were randomized into 1 of 5 treatments to received daily either: an iron supplement (IS), an iron+folic acid supplement (IFS), a multiple micronutrient supplement (MMS), a micronutrient-fortified complementary food as porridge powder (FCF), or zinc+iron+ascorbic acid fortified water (FW). The iron content of each daily dose was 20, 12.5, 10, 10 and 6.7 mg respectively. Hemoglobin (Hb), ferritin, total iron, weight and height were measured at baseline and after 4 months of treatment. Morbidity, treatment acceptability and adherence were recorded during the intervention.
resultsAll treatments significantly increased Hb and total iron concentration; ferritin did not change significantly. Groups MMS, IS and IFS increased Hb (g/dL) [1.50 (95%CI: 1.17, 1.83), 1.48 [(1.18, 1.78) and 1.57 (1.26, 1.88), respectively] and total iron ((μg/dL) [0.15 (0.01, 0.29), 0.19 (0.06, 0.31) and 0.12(-0.01, 0.25), respectively] significantly more than FCF [0.92 (0.64, 1.20)] but not to FW group [0.14 (0.04, 0.24)]. The prevalence of anemia was reduced to a greater extent in the MMS and IFS groups (72% and 69%, respectively) than in the FCF group (45%) (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in anthropometry or in the number of episodes of diarrhea and respiratory infections among treatment groups. The supplements MMS and IS were less acceptable to children, than IFS, FCF and FW.
conclusionThe three supplements IS, ISF and MMS increased Hb more than the FCF; the supplements that contained micronutrients (IFS and MMS) were more effective for reducing the prevalence of anemia. In general, fortified foods were better accepted by the study participants than supplements. CLINICALTRIAL.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00822380.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.