Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20863096›Full record

ArticleACS nano2010

A reexamination of active and passive tumor targeting by using rod-shaped gold nanocrystals and covalently conjugated peptide ligands.

Xiaohua Huang, Xianghong Peng, Yiqing Wang, Yuxiang Wang, Dong M Shin, Mostafa A El-Sayed, Shuming Nie

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 153 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 424 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Porous silicon and silica carriers for delivery of peptide therapeutics.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaohua HuangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, 101 Woodruff Circle Suite 2007, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.
Xianghong Peng
Yiqing Wang
Yuxiang Wang
Dong M Shin
Mostafa A El-Sayed
Shuming Nie
Georgia Institute of Technology · USWinship Cancer InstituteEmory University · USUniversity of Memphis · US

Funding

Tissue and Animal UseU54CA119338 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NIE, SHUMING · 2005 to 2009
$18.4M
TARGETING DEATH RECEPTOR-MEDIATED APOPTOSIS FOR HEAD AND NECK CANCERP50CA128613 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SHIN, DONG M · 2007 to 2011
$12.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA128613NCI NIH HHS P50CA128613NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119338NCI NIH HHS U54CA119338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The targeted delivery of nanoparticles to solid tumors is one of the most important and challenging problems in cancer nanomedicine, but the detailed delivery mechanisms and design principles are still not well understood. Here we report quantitative tumor uptake studies for a class of elongated gold nanocrystals (called nanorods) that are covalently conjugated to tumor-targeting peptides. A major advantage in using gold as a "tracer" is that the accumulated gold in tumors and other organs can be quantitatively determined by elemental mass spectrometry (gold is not a natural element found in animals). Thus, colloidal gold nanorods are stabilized with a layer of polyethylene glycols (PEGs) and are conjugated to three different ligands: (i) a single-chain variable fragment (ScFv) peptide that recognizes the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR); (ii) an amino terminal fragment (ATF) peptide that recognizes the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR); and (iii) a cyclic RGD peptide that recognizes the a(v)β(3) integrin receptor. Quantitative pharmacokinetic and biodistribution data show that these targeting ligands only marginally improve the total gold accumulation in xenograft tumor models in comparison with nontargeted controls, but their use could greatly alter the intracellular and extracellular nanoparticle distributions. When the gold nanorods are administered via intravenous injection, we also find that active molecular targeting of the tumor microenvironments (e.g., fibroblasts, macrophages, and vasculatures) does not significantly influence the tumor nanoparticle uptake. These results suggest that for photothermal cancer therapy, the preferred route of gold nanorod administration is intratumoral injection instead of intravenous injection.

Indexed as

ErbB ReceptorsGoldHumansLigandsLung NeoplasmsMass SpectrometryMaterials TestingMetal NanoparticlesNanomedicineNanotechnologyOligopeptidesPeptidesPolyethylene GlycolsReceptors, Urokinase Plasminogen ActivatorSurface Propertiesarginyl-glycyl-aspartic acidErbB ReceptorsGoldLigandsOligopeptidesPeptidesPolyethylene GlycolsReceptors, Urokinase Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

PMID20863096
PMCPMC2964428
OpenAlexW1969471545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.