Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20863060›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2010

Integrated post-experiment monoisotopic mass refinement: an integrated approach to accurately assign monoisotopic precursor masses to tandem mass spectrometric data.

Hee-Jung Jung, Samuel O Purvine, Hokeun Kim, Vladislav A Petyuk, Seok-Won Hyung, Matthew E Monroe, Dong-Gi Mun, Kyong-Chul Kim, Jong-Moon Park, Su-Jin Kim and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Hee-Jung JungDepartment of Chemistry, Korea University, 1, 5-ka, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-701, Republic of Korea.
Samuel O Purvine
Hokeun Kim
Vladislav A Petyuk
Seok-Won Hyung
Matthew E Monroe
Dong-Gi Mun
Kyong-Chul Kim
Jong-Moon Park
Su-Jin Kim
Nikola Tolic
Gordon W Slysz
Ronald J Moore
Rui Zhao
Joshua N Adkins
Gordon A Anderson
Hookeun Lee
David G Camp
Myeong-Hee Yu
Richard D Smith
Sang-Won Lee

Funding

WORKSHOP AND TRAINING ACTIVITIESP41RR018522 · NCRR · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI SMITH, RICHARD D · 2003 to 2011
$25.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR018522NCRR NIH HHS RR18522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate assignment of monoisotopic precursor masses to tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) data is a fundamental and critically important step for successful peptide identifications in mass spectrometry based proteomics. Here we describe an integrated approach that combines three previously reported methods of treating MS/MS data for precursor mass refinement. This combined method, "integrated post-experiment monoisotopic mass refinement" (iPE-MMR), integrates steps (1) generation of refined MS/MS data by DeconMSn; (2) additional refinement of the resultant MS/MS data by a modified version of PE-MMR; and (3) elimination of systematic errors of precursor masses using DtaRefinery. iPE-MMR is the first method that utilizes all MS information from multiple MS scans of a precursor ion including multiple charge states, in an MS scan, to determine precursor mass. With the combination of these methods, iPE-MMR increases sensitivity in peptide identification and provides increased accuracy when applied to complex high-throughput proteomics data.

Indexed as

PeptidesProteomeProteomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTandem Mass SpectrometryPeptidesProteome

Identifiers

PMID20863060
PMCPMC3019303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.