ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2010
Autoimmune pancreatitis--a new evolving pancreatic disease?
Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complement in Pancreatic Disease-Perpetrator or Savior?Frontiers in immunology · 2017Review
- Localized type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis superimposed upon preexisting intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.World journal of gastroenterology · 2013Article
- Autoimmune pancreatitis and treatment approaches with case reports.Balkan medical journal · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecent advances support the concept of autoimmune pancreatitis as a unique systemic disease because occasional extrapancreatic lesions such as sclerosing cholangitis, sclerosing sialoadenitis, and retroperitoneal fibrosis show similar pathological features with fibrosis and abundant infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells, and are steroid responsive. Based on these findings, several diagnostic criteria have been proposed. MATERIALS AND
methodsAlthough AIP is accepted worldwide as a unique clinical entity, pathogenetic mechanism still remains unclear. To clarify it, genetic background, humoral immunity, candidates of target antigens including self-antigens and molecular mimicry from microbes, cellular immunity including regulatory T cells, complement system, and experimental models are reviewed.
resultsBased on these findings, we have proposed a hypothesis for the pathogenesis of AIP in the biphasic mechanism of "induction" and "progression." In the early stage, initial response to self-antigens (LF, CA-II, CA-IV, PSTI, or α-fodrin) or molecular mimicry (Helicobacter pylori) is induced by decreased naive regulatory T cells (Tregs), and Th1 cells release proinflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-1b, IL-2, and TNF-α). DISCUSSION: In the chronic stage, progression is supported by increased memory Tregs and Th2 immune responses. The classical pathway of complement system may be activated by IgG1 immune complex.
conclusionAs Tregs seem to take important roles in progression as well as induction of the disease, further studies are necessary to clarify the pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20862490What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.