ArticleExperimental brain research2010
Estimates of EPSP amplitude based on changes in motoneuron discharge rate and probability.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The variability of reflex amplitude estimates in motor unit pools depends on the phenotype distribution and discharge statistics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Postinhibitory excitation in motoneurons can be facilitated by hyperpolarization-activated inward currents: A simulation study.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- The Cellular Basis for the Generation of Firing Patterns in Human Motor Units.Advances in neurobiology · 2022Article
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced early silent period and rebound activity re-examined.PloS one · 2019Article
- Reevaluation of reflex responses of the human masseter muscle to electrical lip stimulation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Spinal inhibition and motor function in adults with spastic cerebral palsy.The Journal of physiology · 2016Article
- Human stretch reflex pathways reexamined.Journal of neurophysiology · 2014Article
- Analysis of motoneuron responses to composite synaptic volleys (computer simulation study).Experimental brain research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When motor units are discharging tonically, transient excitatory synaptic inputs produce an increase in the probability of spike occurrence and also increase the instantaneous discharge rate. Several researchers have proposed that these induced changes in discharge rate and probability can be used to estimate the amplitude of the underlying excitatory post-synaptic potential (EPSP). We tested two different methods of estimating EPSP amplitude by comparing the amplitude of simulated EPSPs with their effects on the discharge of rat hypoglossal motoneurons recorded in an in vitro brainstem slice preparation. The first estimation method (simplified-trajectory method) is based on the assumptions that the membrane potential trajectory between spikes can be approximated by a 10 mV post-spike hyperpolarization followed by a linear rise to the next spike and that EPSPs sum linearly with this trajectory. We hypothesized that this estimation method would not be accurate due to interspike variations in membrane conductance and firing threshold that are not included in the model and that an alternative method based on estimating the effective distance to threshold would provide more accurate estimates of EPSP amplitude. This second method (distance-to-threshold method) uses interspike interval statistics to estimate the effective distance to threshold throughout the interspike interval and incorporates this distance-to-threshold trajectory into a threshold-crossing model. We found that the first method systematically overestimated the amplitude of small (<5 mV) EPSPs and underestimated the amplitude of large (>5 mV EPSPs). For large EPSPs, the degree of underestimation increased with increasing background discharge rate. Estimates based on the second method were more accurate for small EPSPs than those based on the first model, but estimation errors were still large for large EPSPs. These errors were likely due to two factors: (1) the distance to threshold can only be directly estimated over a limited portion of the interspike interval and (2) the distance to threshold can be affected by the EPSP itself. Both methods provide the most accurate EPSP estimates for EPSP amplitudes less than 5 mV and moderate background discharge rates (~15 imp/s).
Indexed as
Identifiers
20862458What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.