Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20860576›Full record

ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2010

Enhancing policymakers' understanding of disparities: relevant data from an information-rich environment.

Noralou P Roos, Leslie L Roos, Marni Brownell, Emma L Fuller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Validation of the Kidney Failure Risk Equation in Manitoba.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The right kind of evidence--integrating, measuring, and making it count in health equity research.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2012
    Article
  16. Public health interventions to reduce inequalities: what do we know works?Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The mandatory census: tension between individual rights and the public good.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noralou P RoosManitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB. Noralou_Roos@cpe.umanitoba.ca
Leslie L Roos
Marni Brownell
Emma L Fuller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextInformation-rich environments, with access and funding provided by government, make it possible to organize longitudinal administrative data to support analyses of policy-relevant questions. This paper describes insights into children's well-being and social equity obtained from data available in Manitoba, Canada, and highlights findings that have engaged policymakers.

methodsAnalyses draw on Manitoba-linked data providing information over time (going back to 1970 in some files) and across space (with residential location documented every six months) for each provincial resident. Routinely collected data from the Ministries of Health, Education, and Family Services and Consumer Affairs have been integrated with a population registry.

findingsIdentifying risk factors and presenting outcomes by social groups and by local communities capture the attention of policymakers. Linking an individual's area of residence to census and health data has led to developing measures of population health status and socioeconomic status. These measures focus on whether delivery patterns track health and educational needs, and a population registry makes it possible to describe who is (and is not) served by each program.

conclusionsThe nature of health and social research has been changed by the development of information-rich environments. Many findings in Manitoba could not be replicated without a population registry. Engaging decision makers through effective presentations can ensure continuing support for diverse efforts based on these environments, and this article suggests ways of better communicating with policymakers.

Indexed as

Data CollectionHealth PolicyHealth Status DisparitiesChildChild WelfareDecision MakingHealth StatusHumansManitobaNeeds AssessmentPovertyPublic PolicyRegistriesRisk FactorsSchoolsSocial Class

Identifiers

PMID20860576
PMCPMC3000932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.