Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20859549›Full record

Trial reportVascular health and risk management2010

Effectiveness and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan and amlodipine in clinical practice.

Peter Bramlage, Wolf-Peter Wolf, Thomas Stuhr, Eva-Maria Fronk, Wolfhard Erdlenbruch, Reinhard Ketelhut, Roland E Schmieder

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vascular health and risk management, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Blood pressure management in a cohort of hypertensive patients in Germany treated by cardiologists.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter BramlageInstitute for Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Epidemiology, Mahlow, Germany. peter.bramlage@ikpe.de
Wolf-Peter Wolf
Thomas Stuhr
Eva-Maria Fronk
Wolfhard Erdlenbruch
Reinhard Ketelhut
Roland E Schmieder
Mahlo (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan and amlodipine in an unselected population of patients in primary care and to compare the results with recent randomized controlled trial evidence.

methodsA multicenter, noninterventional, noncontrolled observational study with 8241 hypertensive patients seen by 2187 physicians in daily practice. Blood pressure (BP) reduction, comorbid disease, pharmacotherapy, and tolerability were documented over a 12-18-week observational period.

resultsPatients had a mean age of 62.8 ± 11.8 years (48.1% female), and 74.8% had at least one comorbid risk factor or condition. In total, 51.3% received olmesartan-amlodipine 20/5 mg, 30.6% received 40/5 mg, and 17.9% received 40/10 mg at baseline, mostly because of lack of efficacy on prior antihypertensive therapy (73.8%). BP at baseline was 161.8 ± 16.6/93.6 ± 10.2 mmHg (39.8% had Grade 2 hypertension), and the observed BP reduction was -29.0 ± 17.1/-13.5 ± 10.9 mmHg (P < 0.0001), with a significant correlation between BP at baseline and BP reduction (Spearman's Rho -0.811 for systolic BP and -0.759 for diastolic BP). BP reduction appeared to be dependent on dose and prior antihypertensive therapy, but not on age, gender, body mass index, duration of hypertension, or the presence of diabetes. At the final visit, 69.4% (4.3% at baseline) were controlled (<140/90 mmHg). Adverse drug reactions were observed in 2.76% of the study population; 94.25% of these adverse drug reactions were judged as nonserious events, and 31.5% of all adverse drug reactions reported were peripheral edema.

conclusionThe fixed-dose olmesartan-amlodipine combination was effective and well tolerated in an unselected population of patients in primary care practice. These results confirm prior randomized controlled trial evidence.

Indexed as

AgedAmlodipineAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCalcium Channel BlockersDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansHypertensionImidazolesMaleMiddle AgedTetrazolesTreatment OutcomeAmlodipineAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersDrug CombinationsImidazolesolmesartanTetrazolesantihypertensive treatmentblood pressurecardiovascular riskobservation

Identifiers

PMID20859549
PMCPMC2941791
OpenAlexW2091535922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.