Closing the loop between neurons and neurotechnology.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Neuromorphic-Based Neuroprostheses for Brain Rewiring: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives in Neuroengineering.Brain sciences · 2022
   Review
2. Plasticity and Adaptation in Neuromorphic Biohybrid Systems.iScience · 2020
   Review
3. A Neuromorphic Prosthesis to Restore Communication in Neuronal Networks.iScience · 2019
   Article
4. Microfluidic Neurons, a New Way in Neuromorphic Engineering?Micromachines · 2016
   Article
5. Using "smart stimulators" to treat Parkinson's disease: re-engineering neurostimulation devices.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2012
   Article
6. High-density microelectrode array recordings and real-time spike sorting for closed-loop experiments: an emerging technology to study neural plasticity.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2012
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.