Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20857492›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of cancer2011

Biologic markers of sun exposure and melanoma risk in women: pooled case-control analysis.

Catherine M Olsen, Michael S Zens, Adele C Green, Therese A Stukel, C D'Arcy J Holman, Thomas Mack, J Mark Elwood, Elizabeth A Holly, Carlotta Sacerdote, Richard Gallagher and 13 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Epidemiology beyond its limits.Science advances · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Role of BMI and hormone therapy in melanoma risk: a case-control study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Identifying risk factors using a skin cancer screening program.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center · 2013
    Article
  11. A dermatologist's perspective on vitamin D.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 14 institutions in 5 countries.

Catherine M OlsenCancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia. Catherine.Olsen@qimr.edu.au
Michael S Zens
Adele C Green
Therese A Stukel
C D'Arcy J Holman
Thomas Mack
J Mark Elwood
Elizabeth A Holly
Carlotta Sacerdote
Richard Gallagher
Anthony J Swerdlow
Bruce K Armstrong
Stefano Rosso
Connie Kirkpatrick
Roberto Zanetti
Julia Newton Bishop
Veronique Bataille
Yu-Mei Chang
Rona Mackie
Anne Østerlind
Marianne Berwick
Margaret R Karagas
David C Whiteman
Dartmouth College · USQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUBC Cancer Agency · CAPiedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention · ITFranciscan Health · USHemel Hempstead Hospital · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Sydney · AUUniversity of Turin · ITUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

Melanoma Prevention: Using the SunK05CA131675 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI BERWICK, MARIANNE · 2011 to 2015
$795k
DIVERGENT CAUSAL PATHWAYS TO MELANOMA: A COMBINED ANALYSIS OF 12 CASE-CONTROL STUR03CA132188 · NCI · QUEENSLAND INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI WHITEMAN, DAVID C · 2007 to 2008
$101k
Cancer Research UK 10589NCI NIH HHS K05 CA131675NCI NIH HHS R03 CA132188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A model has been proposed whereby melanomas arise through two distinct pathways dependent on the relative influence of host susceptibility and sun exposure. Such pathways may explain site-specific patterns of melanoma occurrence. To explore this model, we investigated the relationship between melanoma risk and general markers of acute (recalled sunburns) and chronic (prevalent solar keratoses) sun exposure, stratified by anatomic site and host phenotype. Our working hypothesis was that head and neck melanomas have stronger associations with solar keratoses and weaker associations with sunburn than trunk melanomas. We conducted a collaborative analysis using original data from women subjects of 11 case-control studies of melanoma (2,575 cases, 3,241 controls). We adjusted for potential confounding effects of sunlamp use and sunbathing. The magnitude of sunburn associations did not differ significantly by melanoma site, nevus count or histologic subtype of melanoma. Across all sites, relative risk of melanoma increased with an increasing number of reported lifetime "painful" sunburns, lifetime "severe" sunburns and "severe" sunburns in youth (p(trend) < 0.001), with pooled odds ratios (pORs) for the highest category of sunburns versus no sunburns of 3.22 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.04-5.09] for lifetime "painful" sunburns, 2.10 (95%CI 1.30-3.38) for lifetime "severe" sunburns and 2.43 (95%CI 1.61-3.65) for "severe" sunburns in youth. Solar keratoses strongly increased the risk of head and neck melanoma (pOR 4.91, 95%CI 2.10-11.46), but data were insufficient to assess risk for other sites. Reported sunburn is strongly associated with melanoma on all major body sites.

Indexed as

SunlightAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansKeratosisMelanomaMiddle AgedSkin NeoplasmsSunburnBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID20857492
PMCPMC3035752
OpenAlexW2040741756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.