Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20857281›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2011

Smaller, weaker, and less stiff bones evolve from changes in subsistence strategy.

N C Nowlan, K J Jepsen, E F Morgan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Histomorphometry and cortical robusticity of the adult human femur.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Gracility of the modern Homo sapiens skeleton is the result of decreased biomechanical loading.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N C NowlanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, 110 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA. nowlann@tcd.ie
K J Jepsen
E F Morgan
Boston University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

GENETIC DETERMINATION OF SKELETAL FRAGILITYR01AR044927 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JEPSEN, KARL J · 2002 to 2014
$4.3M
Functionality and Fracture Susceptibility of Corticocancellous StructuresR01AR056639 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JEPSEN, KARL J · 2009 to 2010
$1.1M
Genetic Determination of Skeletal FragilityR56AR044927 · NIAMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI JEPSEN, KARL J · 2009 to 2009
$500k
GENETIC DETERMINATION OF SKELETAL FRAGILITYR29AR044927 · NIAMS · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI JEPSEN, KARL J · 1998 to 2002
$268k
NIAMS NIH HHS AR44927NIAMS NIH HHS AR56639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWe propose a computational model with which to examine the evolution of bone. Our results indicate that changes in subsistence strategy have influenced the evolution of bone growth and mechanoregulation, and predict that bone size, stiffness, and structural strength may decrease in future generations, bringing increased risk of fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis.

introductionArcheological data suggest that bone size and strength have decreased over evolution. We hypothesize that changing evolutionary pressures and levels of physical activity, both arising from changes in subsistence strategy, have affected the evolution of bone. We propose a computational model with which to examine the evolution of bone growth and mechanoregulation due to the transitions from hunter-gatherer to agricultural to modern lifestyles.

methodsThe evolution of genes governing growth and mechanoregulation in a population of bones is simulated, where each individual is represented by a 2-D bone cross-section. Genetic variability is assumed to modulate growth through mechanoregulatory factors that direct periosteal expansion, endosteal expansion/infilling, and ash content accretion in response to strains incurred during walking.

resultsThe model predicts decreases in cortical area and section modulus (a measure of structural strength) and increases in maximum compressive strain over the course of the simulation, meaning evolution of smaller, less strong, and less stiff bones is predicted for the population average. The model predicts small but continued decreases in size, strength, and stiffness in modern populations, despite the absence of a strong evolutionary advantage to efficient bones during this phase.

conclusionIn conclusion, our results show that changing loading regimes and evolutionary pressures may have influenced the evolution of bone growth and mechanoregulation, and predict that bone size and strength may continue to decrease in future generations, bringing increased risk of fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionLife StyleModels, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalBone and BonesBone DevelopmentComputer SimulationGene PoolHumansMechanotransduction, CellularMotor ActivitySedentary BehaviorSelection, GeneticWeight-Bearing

Identifiers

PMID20857281
OpenAlexW2007193910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.