ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2011
Sudden death from ruptured intracranial vascular malformation.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Fatal intracranial hemorrhage from brain AVM in a 7-week-old infant: case report and recent literature review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) vascular malformations are well-known entities that may cause sudden death from rupture and intracranial hemorrhage. Despite this, relatively few papers deal with these lesions in the forensic literature. Here, we present four cases of sudden, non-traumatic death caused by ruptured CNS vascular malformations. In all four cases, the definitive source of bleeding was not identified grossly, being diagnosed only after relatively extensive histologic examination. When a source of intracranial hemorrhage is not readily identified at autopsy, it is common for forensic pathologists to rule the cause of death in such cases as "spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage" or "spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage," depending on the location of the hemorrhage. Whether or not histologic evaluation is performed in such cases depends on pathologist preference or office policy, and may be influenced by limited available funding for such studies. Because vascular malformations are not always grossly visible at autopsy when accompanied by intracranial hemorrhage, we contend that it is important to thoroughly investigate the underlying cause of such hemorrhage through a meticulous gross examination as well as histologic examination. Such examination will lead to a more accurate assignment of the cause of death, which may have important implications for surviving family members, and will lead to a better understanding of the natural history of these intracranial lesions. A brief discussion of the histologic classification of CNS vascular malformations is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.