ArticlePloS one2010
Development of social variation in reproductive schedules: a study from an English urban area.
Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reproductive Strategies and Romantic Love in Early Modern Europe.Archives of sexual behavior · 2024Article
- Lifehistory Trade-Offs Influence Women's Reproductive Strategies.Adaptive human behavior and physiology · 2024Article
- Service delivery inaccessibility as a predictor of teenage pregnancy in South Africa.African health sciences · 2023Article
- Association Between Childhood Neighborhood Quality and the Risk of Cognitive Dysfunction in Chinese Middle-Aged and Elderly Population: The Moderation Effect of Body Mass Index.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Childhood environmental adversity is not linked to lower levels of cooperative behaviour in economic games.Evolutionary human sciences · 2021Article
- No evidence for a relationship between MHC heterozygosity and life history strategy in a sample of North American undergraduates.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Childhood adversity accelerates intended reproductive timing in adolescent girls without increasing interest in infants.PloS one · 2014Article
- Primary care support for youth mental health: a preliminary evidence base for Ireland's Mid-West.Irish journal of medical science · 2013Article
- No country for old men: street use and social diet in urban Newcastle.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2012Article
- Life-history theory, chronic childhood illness and the timing of first reproduction in a British birth cohort.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is striking social variation in the timing of the onset of childbearing in contemporary England, with the mean age at first motherhood about 8 years earlier in the most deprived compared to the least deprived neighbourhoods. However, relatively little is known about how these social differences in reproductive schedule develop in childhood. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe studied the development of differences in reproductive schedules, using a cross-sectional survey over 1000 school students aged 9-15 in the metropolitan borough of North Tyneside. Students from more deprived neighbourhoods had earlier ideal ages for parenthood than those from more affluent ones, and these differences were fully apparent by age 11. We found evidence consistent with three mechanisms playing a role in maintaining the socioeconomic gradient. These were: vertical intergenerational transmission (students whose own parents were younger at their birth wanted children younger); oblique intergenerational transmission (students in neighbourhoods where parents were younger in general wanted children earlier); and low parental investment (students who did not feel emotionally supported by their own parents wanted children at a younger age). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results shed some light on the proximate factors which may be involved in maintaining early childbearing in disadvantaged communities. They help understand why educational initiatives aimed at adolescents tend to have no effect, whereas improving the well-being of poor families with young children may do so. Our results also suggest that there will be considerable intergenerational inertia in the response of reproductive schedules to changing socioecological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.