ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2010
CMR for characterization of the myocardium in acute coronary syndromes.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Season and myocardial injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study.PloS one · 2019Trial
- Soluble TNF receptors are associated with infarct size and ventricular dysfunction in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.PloS one · 2013Trial
- Prognostic Value of Left-Ventricular Filling Pressure Estimated by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Radiomics applications in cardiac imaging: a comprehensive review.La Radiologia medica · 2023Review
- Prospects for Precision Medicine in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Patient-Level Insights into Myocardial Injury and Repair.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Role of Intracoronary Imaging in Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Disease (MINOCA): A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Novel Applications for Invasive and Non-invasive Tools in the Era of Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Revascularisation.Current cardiology reviews · 2022Review
- Prognostic value of myocardial salvage index assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- A completely automated pipeline for 3D reconstruction of human heart from 2D cine magnetic resonance slices.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021Article
- Clinical Significance of Serum Lactate in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Inference of ventricular activation properties from non-invasive electrocardiography.Medical image analysis · 2021Article
- Myocardial salvage is increased after sympathetic renal denervation in a pig model of acute infarction.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021Article
- Imaging tools for assessment of myocardial fibrosis in humans: the need for greater detail.Biophysical reviews · 2020Review
- Hyper-acute cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping predicts infarct characteristics in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020Article
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Takotsubo Syndrome.European cardiology · 2017Review
- Clinical Significance of Postinfarct Fever in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Article
- Morphine Does Not Affect Myocardial Salvage in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.PloS one · 2017Article
- D-Dimer Levels Predict Myocardial Injury in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.PloS one · 2016Article
- Relationship of T2-Weighted MRI Myocardial Hyperintensity and the Ischemic Area-At-Risk.Circulation research · 2015Article
- Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute coronary syndrome.Global cardiology science & practice · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) as a diagnostic technique is well established. CMR enables tissue characterization, distinction between myocardial scar tissue and viable tissue, and evaluation of myocardial perfusion and contractile function. To date, CMR has been mostly applied in the assessment of stable disease; however, a role for CMR in the acute setting is also emerging. An accurate appraisal of the myocardium with CMR in the first hours after the onset of chest pain could provide supporting information to standard diagnostic tools, such as electrocardiography and measurement of blood biomarkers, which could help guide the selection of appropriate treatment. The aims of this integrated approach include positive identification of an ischemic syndrome, estimation of downstream areas at risk of damage, evaluation of epicardial artery patency and small vessel integrity, quantification of infarct size, and determination of myocardial function. This Review critically evaluates both established and emerging CMR techniques, and relates the imaging findings to the underlying pathophysiological processes in acute coronary syndromes. A more thorough understanding of CMR techniques will clarify their potential clinical applications and limitations, and assess the practicality of CMR in the setting of acute coronary syndromes, where early intervention is crucial to save myocardium at risk of irreversible injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.