Trial reportAnnals of internal medicine2010
Sex-based outcomes of darunavir-ritonavir therapy: a single-group trial.
Trial report in Annals of internal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00381303 (GRACE), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
GRACE: An Open-label, Multicenter Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of PREZISTA (Darunavir)/Ritonavir by Gender and Race, When Administered in Combination With an Individually Optimized Background Regimen Over a 48-week Treatment Period.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sex, age, race and intervention type in clinical studies of HIV cure: a systematic review.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2015Pooled it
- Evaluation of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in HIV-1-Infected Patients Treated with Darunavir.Drugs in R&D · 2018Trial
- Week 48 resistance analysis of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir DF versus Atazanavir + Ritonavir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir DF in HIV-1 infected women (WAVES study GS-US-236-0128).HIV clinical trials · 2017Trial
- Integrase inhibitor versus protease inhibitor based regimen for HIV-1 infected women (WAVES): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study.The lancet. HIV · 2016Trial
- Efficacy and tolerability of 3 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing antiretroviral regimens for treatment-naive volunteers infected with HIV-1: a randomized, controlled equivalence trial.Annals of internal medicine · 2014Trial
- Sex differences in responses to antiretroviral treatment in South African HIV-infected children on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir- and nevirapine-based treatment.BMC pediatrics · 2014Trial
- Issues in women's participation in a phase III community HIV vaccine trial in Thailand.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2013Trial
- Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of raltegravir in a diverse cohort of HIV-infected patients: 48-week results from the REALMRK Study.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2013Trial
- Effects of darunavir/ritonavir-based therapy on metabolic and anthropometric parameters in women and men over 48 weeks.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2011Trial
- Darunavir, ritonavir, and etravirine pharmacokinetics in the cervicovaginal fluid and blood plasma of HIV-infected women.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2011Trial
- Comparative gender analysis of the efficacy and safety of atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir at 96 weeks in the CASTLE study.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2011Trial
- Differences in antiretroviral safety and efficacy by sex in a multinational randomized clinical trial.HIV clinical trialsTrial
- Recruitment and Retention of Women Living With HIV for Clinical Research: A Review.AIDS and behavior · 2021Review
- Screening and Enrollment by Sex in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Clinical Trials in the United States.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020Article
- Very high baseline HIV viremia impairs efficacy of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based ART: a long-term observation in treatment-naïve patients.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2020Article
- Brief Report: Sex Differences in Outcomes for Individuals Presenting for Third-Line Antiretroviral Therapy.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2020Article
- Enhanced immunovirological response in women compared to men after antiretroviral therapy initiation during acute and early HIV-1 infection: results from a longitudinal study in the French ANRS Primo cohort.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2020Article
- Sex-based differences in antiretroviral therapy initiation, switching and treatment interruptions: global overview from the International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA).Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2018Article
- Sex Differences in HIV Infection.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2018Review
- Influence of Sex/Gender and Race on Responses to Raltegravir Combined With Tenofovir-Emtricitabine in Treatment-Naive Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Infected Patients: Pooled Analyses of the STARTMRK and QDMRK Studies.Open forum infectious diseases · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWomen account for an increasing proportion of patients with HIV-1 but remain underrepresented in antiretroviral clinical trials.
objectiveTo evaluate sex-based differences in efficacy and adverse events in treatment-experienced, HIV-positive women and men receiving darunavir-ritonavir therapy over 48 weeks.
designMulticenter, open-label, phase 3b study designed to enroll a high proportion of women, with sample size determined on the basis of a noninferiority design with a maximum allowable difference of 15% in virologic response favoring men. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00381303)
setting65 sites in the United States, Puerto Rico, and Canada. PATIENTS: 287 women and 142 men.
interventionPatients received darunavir-ritonavir, 600/100 mg twice daily, plus an investigator-selected optimized background regimen. MEASUREMENTS: Virologic response (HIV RNA <50 copies/mL using a time-to-loss of virologic response [TLOVR] algorithm) and adverse events were assessed over 48 weeks.
results67% of patients were women; 84% of patients were black or Hispanic. A higher proportion of women discontinued treatment than men (32.8% vs. 23.2%; P = 0.042); more women than men discontinued treatment for reasons other than virologic failure. Response rates in women and men at week 48 were 50.9% and 58.5%, respectively (intention-to-treat TLOVR), and 73.0% and 73.5%, respectively (TLOVR censored for patients who withdrew for reasons other than virologic failure). The absolute difference in response, based on logistic regression and adjusted for baseline log(10) viral load and CD4(+) cell count, was -9.6 percentage points (95% CI, -19.9 to 0.7 percentage points; P = 0.067) for intention-to-treat TLOVR and -3.9 percentage points (CI, -13.9 to 6.0 percentage points; P = 0.438) for TLOVR population that censored patients who withdrew for reasons other than virologic failure. Adverse events were similar between the sexes. The most common grade 2 to 4 adverse events that were considered at least possibly treatment related in women and men were nausea (5.2% and 2.8%, respectively), diarrhea (4.5% and 4.9%, respectively), and rash (2.1% and 2.8%, respectively). LIMITATION: Baseline characteristics differed between sexes.
conclusionNonsignificant, sex-based differences in response were found during the 48-week study; however, these differences were probably due to higher discontinuation rates in women, suggesting that additional efforts are needed to retain women in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.