Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20855620›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Oscillatory phase coupling coordinates anatomically dispersed functional cell assemblies.

Ryan T Canolty, Karunesh Ganguly, Steven W Kennerley, Charles F Cadieu, Kilian Koepsell, Jonathan D Wallis, Jose M Carmena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Local field potentials of subthalamic nucleus contain electrophysiological footprints of motor subtypes of Parkinson's disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Orthogonal-Rotational Dynamics Supports Efficient Encoding and Updating for Streaming Information in Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryan T CanoltyElectrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Karunesh Ganguly
Steven W Kennerley
Charles F Cadieu
Kilian Koepsell
Jonathan D Wallis
Jose M Carmena

Funding

MEMORYP01NS040813 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KNIGHT, ROBERT THOMAS · 2002 to 2012
$12.9M
The Neural Representation of Reward in Working MemoryR01DA019028 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI WALLIS, JONI D · 2005 to 2014
$3.6M
The Neuronal Mechanisms Underlying Choice Behavior in the Frontal LobeF32MH081521 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KENNERLEY, STEVE WAYNE · 2007 to 2009
$130k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019028NIDA NIH HHS R01DA-19028NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH081521NIMH NIH HHS F32MH-081521NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS040813NINDS NIH HHS P01NS-040813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hebb proposed that neuronal cell assemblies are critical for effective perception, cognition, and action. However, evidence for brain mechanisms that coordinate multiple coactive assemblies remains lacking. Neuronal oscillations have been suggested as one possible mechanism for cell assembly coordination. Prior studies have shown that spike timing depends upon local field potential (LFP) phase proximal to the cell body, but few studies have examined the dependence of spiking on distal LFP phases in other brain areas far from the neuron or the influence of LFP-LFP phase coupling between distal areas on spiking. We investigated these interactions by recording LFPs and single-unit activity using multiple microelectrode arrays in several brain areas and then used a unique probabilistic multivariate phase distribution to model the dependence of spike timing on the full pattern of proximal LFP phases, distal LFP phases, and LFP-LFP phase coupling between electrodes. Here we show that spiking activity in single neurons and neuronal ensembles depends on dynamic patterns of oscillatory phase coupling between multiple brain areas, in addition to the effects of proximal LFP phase. Neurons that prefer similar patterns of phase coupling exhibit similar changes in spike rates, whereas neurons with different preferences show divergent responses, providing a basic mechanism to bind different neurons together into coordinated cell assemblies. Surprisingly, phase-coupling-based rate correlations are independent of interneuron distance. Phase-coupling preferences correlate with behavior and neural function and remain stable over multiple days. These findings suggest that neuronal oscillations enable selective and dynamic control of distributed functional cell assemblies.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBrainMacacaMicroelectrodesNerve NetNeuronsPeriodicityTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20855620
PMCPMC2951408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.