Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20855574›Full record

ReviewGenetics2010

The birds and the bees and the flowers and the trees: lessons from genetic mapping of sex determination in plants and animals.

Deborah Charlesworth, Judith E Mank

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Homology in Sex Determination in Two Distant Spiny Frogs,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex-Linked Loci on the W Chromosome in the Multi-Ocellated Racerunner (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Repeated translocation of a supergene underlying rapid sex chromosome turnover inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. New self-sexingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Identification and Characterization of the Masculinizing Function of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. InSexBase: an annotated genomic resource of sex chromosomes and sex-biased genes in insects.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021
    Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deborah CharlesworthDepartment of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom. deborah.charlesworth@ed.ac.uk
Judith E Mank

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E020909/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H002006/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to identify genetic markers in nonmodel systems has allowed geneticists to construct linkage maps for a diversity of species, and the sex-determining locus is often among the first to be mapped. Sex determination is an important area of study in developmental and evolutionary biology, as well as ecology. Its importance for organisms might suggest that sex determination is highly conserved. However, genetic studies have shown that sex determination mechanisms, and the genes involved, are surprisingly labile. We review studies using genetic mapping and phylogenetic inferences, which can help reveal evolutionary pattern within this lability and potentially identify the changes that have occurred among different sex determination systems. We define some of the terminology, particularly where confusion arises in writing about such a diverse range of organisms, and highlight some major differences between plants and animals, and some important similarities. We stress the importance of studying taxa suitable for testing hypotheses, and the need for phylogenetic studies directed to taxa where the patterns of changes can be most reliably inferred, if the ultimate goal of testing hypotheses regarding the selective forces that have led to changes in such an essential trait is to become feasible.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesBirdsChromosome MappingFlowersHumansSex Determination ProcessesTrees

Identifiers

PMID20855574
PMCPMC2940314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.