Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20855467›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2011

Phase 3 study of docosahexaenoic acid-paclitaxel versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma.

A Y Bedikian, R C DeConti, R Conry, S Agarwala, N Papadopoulos, K B Kim, M Ernstoff

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. A randomized, controlled phase III trial of nab-Paclitaxel versus dacarbazine in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic melanoma.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2015
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pharmacokinetic behaviors of soft nanoparticulate formulations of chemotherapeutics.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Nanoparticulation of Prodrug into Medicines for Cancer Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  20. Targeting Strategies for Enhancing Paclitaxel Specificity in Chemotherapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

A Y BedikianDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Electronic address: abedikia@mdanderson.org.
R C DeContiDepartment of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa.
R ConryDivision of Hematology & Oncology, Kirkland Clinic at Acton Road, Birmingham.
S AgarwalaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, St Luke's Cancer Center, Bethlehem.
N PapadopoulosDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
K B KimDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
M ErnstoffDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USKirklin Clinic · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDocosahexaenoic acid-paclitaxel (DHA-paclitaxel, Taxoprexin(®)) is made by covalently conjugating the essential fatty acid DHA to the paclitaxel molecule. Preclinical studies of DHA-paclitaxel have demonstrated increased activity relative to paclitaxel and the potential for an improved therapeutic ratio. In the present study, the efficacy and toxicity profiles of DHA-paclitaxel were compared with those of dacarbazine.

methodsIn this study, 393 chemonaive patients with metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to receive either DHA-paclitaxel at a starting dose of 900 mg/m(2) IV on day 1 every 3 weeks or dacarbazine at a starting dose of 1000 mg/m(2) IV on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point of the study was the comparison of overall survival (OS).

resultsNo significant difference in OS was noted between patients in the DHA-paclitaxel and dacarbazine arms. Similarly, there were no significant differences in response rate, duration of response, time to progression, and time to treatment failure between the two drugs. Safety results of the two drugs were as predicted from prior studies. Myelosuppression was more common with DHA-paclitaxel.

conclusionsDHA-paclitaxel was not superior to dacarbazine. We conclude that further studies with the drug on an every 3-week schedule in melanoma are not warranted.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDacarbazineDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPaclitaxelDacarbazinedocosahexaenoyl-paclitaxelPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID20855467
PMCPMC4303777
OpenAlexW2149077650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.