Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20855427›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2010

Functional conservation of DNA methylation in the pea aphid and the honeybee.

Brendan G Hunt, Jennifer A Brisson, Soojin V Yi, Michael A D Goodisman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The role of epigenetics, particularly DNA methylation, in the evolution of caste in insect societies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Comparative Epigenomics Reveals Host Diversity of theFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dietary Modulation of the Epigenome.Physiological reviews · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brendan G HuntSchool of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, GA, USA.
Jennifer A Brisson
Soojin V Yi
Michael A D Goodisman
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Contrasting environmental and genetic controls of alternative phenotypesR00ES017367 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI BRISSON, JENNIFER A · 2009 to 2011
$758k
NIEHS NIH HHS 4R00ES017367NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES017367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation is a fundamental epigenetic mark known to have wide-ranging effects on gene regulation in a variety of animal taxa. Comparative genomic analyses can help elucidate the function of DNA methylation by identifying conserved features of methylated genes and other genomic regions. In this study, we used computational approaches to distinguish genes marked by heavy methylation from those marked by little or no methylation in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. We investigated if these two classes had distinct evolutionary histories and functional roles by conducting comparative analysis with the honeybee, Apis (Ap.) mellifera. We found that highly methylated orthologs in A. pisum and Ap. mellifera exhibited greater conservation of methylation status, suggesting that highly methylated genes in ancestral species may remain highly methylated over time. We also found that methylated genes tended to show different rates of evolution than unmethylated genes. In addition, genes targeted by methylation were enriched for particular biological processes that differed from those in relatively unmethylated genes. Finally, methylated genes were preferentially ubiquitously expressed among alternate phenotypes in both species, whereas genes lacking signatures of methylation were preferentially associated with condition-specific gene regulation expression. Overall, our analyses support a conserved role for DNA methylation in insects with comparable methylation systems.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAnimalsAphidsBeesComparative Genomic HybridizationCpG IslandsEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsExpressed Sequence TagsGene Expression RegulationGenome, InsectOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Identifiers

PMID20855427
PMCPMC2962555
OpenAlexW2146845831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.