Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20855313›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2010

Retrieving chronological age from dental remains of early fossil hominins to reconstruct human growth in the past.

M Christopher Dean

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
38.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Homo erectus Female Revisited.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Trabecular bone ontogeny tracks neural development and life history among humans and non-human primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Impact of claudin-10 deficiency on amelogenesis: Lesson from a HELIX tooth.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Early life of Neanderthals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Measures of maturation in early fossil hominins: events at the first transition from australopiths to early Homo.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M Christopher DeanDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. ucgacrd@ucl.ac.uk
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A chronology of dental development in Pan troglodytes is arguably the best available model with which to compare and contrast reconstructed dental chronologies of the earliest fossil hominins. Establishing a time scale for growth is a requirement for being able to make further comparative observations about timing and rate during both dento-skeletal growth and brain growth. The absolute timing of anterior tooth crown and root formation appears not to reflect the period of somatic growth. In contrast, the molar dentition best reflects changes to the total growth period. Earlier initiation of molar mineralization, shorter crown formation times, less root length formed at gingival emergence into functional occlusion are cumulatively expressed as earlier ages at molar eruption. Things that are similar in modern humans and Pan, such as the total length of time taken to form individual teeth, raise expectations that these would also have been the same in fossil hominins. The best evidence there is from the youngest fossil hominin specimens suggests a close resemblance to the model for Pan but also hints that Gorilla may be a better developmental model for some. A mosaic of great ape-like features currently best describes the timing of early hominin dental development.

Indexed as

Age Determination by TeethAnimalsHominidaeHumansMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMolarOdontogenesisPan troglodytes

Identifiers

PMID20855313
PMCPMC2981956
OpenAlexW2150455056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.