ReviewThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2011
A call for action: Comparative effectiveness research in asthma.
Review in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01128348 (A Patient Advocate and Literacy-Based Treatment of Asthma), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Patient Advocate and Literacy-Based Treatment of Asthma
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Eszopiclone for insomnia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Design of a pragmatic trial in minority children presenting to the emergency department with uncontrolled asthma: The CHICAGO Plan.Contemporary clinical trials · 2017Trial
- A patient advocate to facilitate access and improve communication, care, and outcomes in adults with moderate or severe asthma: Rationale, design, and methods of a randomized controlled trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2017Trial
- Quality standards in respiratory real-life effectiveness research: the REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT): report from the Respiratory Effectiveness Group-European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force.Clinical and translational allergy · 2019Article
- Comparative effectiveness trials in asthma - how will I recognize one?Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2018Review
- An evaluation of exact matching and propensity score methods as applied in a comparative effectiveness study of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma.Pragmatic and observational research · 2017Article
- Effectiveness of Montelukast on asthma control in infants: methodology of a French claims data study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2015Observational
- Management of asthma in the elderly patient.Clinical interventions in aging · 2013Review
- Inhaled corticosteroids used for the control of asthma in a "real-life" setting do not affect linear growth velocity in prepubertal children.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2012Article
- Reassessing the evidence hierarchy in asthma: evaluating comparative effectiveness.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2011Review
- Comparative effectiveness research in lung diseases and sleep disorders: recommendations from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2011Article
- Advancing asthma care: the glass is only half full!The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2011Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) has received considerable research attention in recent months, and efforts to promote CER are part of the newly enacted Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. In this article we define CER and how it complements traditional efficacy research in asthma and discuss how CER can help provide the basis for rational decision making about the care of individual patients with asthma and how best to deliver this care in real-world settings. We present information about the challenges and opportunities to conduct CER, including enhanced patient registries for observational CER and effectiveness trials (also called pragmatic trials). We discuss the urgent need to define the appropriate methodologies for CER and to develop and prioritize a research agenda for CER studies in asthmatic subjects with the help of a diverse group of stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.