Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20853132›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2011

Phase II study of metronomic chemotherapy with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma after progression on bevacizumab therapy.

David A Reardon, Annick Desjardins, Katherine Peters, Sridharan Gururangan, John Sampson, Jeremy N Rich, Roger McLendon, James E Herndon, Jennifer Marcello, Stevie Threatt and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Incorporation of biomarkers in phase II studies of recurrent glioblastoma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Circulating Immune Cell and Outcome Analysis from the Phase II Study of PD-L1 Blockade with Durvalumab for Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Cullin1 regulates proliferation, migration and invasion of glioma cells.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2014
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David A ReardonDepartment of Surgery, The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3624, Durham, NC 27710, USA. reard003@mc.duke.edu
Annick Desjardins
Katherine Peters
Sridharan Gururangan
John Sampson
Jeremy N Rich
Roger McLendon
James E Herndon
Jennifer Marcello
Stevie Threatt
Allan H Friedman
James J Vredenburgh
Henry S Friedman
Duke University Hospital · USDuke Medical Center · USPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation · US

Funding

TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES IN HUMAN MEDULLOBLASTOMAP50NS020023 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI REARDON, DAVID A · 1985 to 2013
$17.3M
BRAIN TUMORS: IMMUNOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL STUDIESR37CA011898 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BIGNER, DARELL D · 1988 to 2012
$8.1M
Research Training in Age-Related Cognitive DisordersT32AG027668 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARILYN S. ALBERT · 2007 to 2026
$6.3M
SPORE in Brain CancerP20CA096890 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BIGNER, DARELL D · 2002 to 2003
$1000k
NCI NIH HHS 5 R37 CA11898NCI NIH HHS P20 CA096890NCI NIH HHS R37 CA011898NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR 30NIA NIH HHS T32 AG027668NINDS NIH HHS 5P50-NS-20023NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS020023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of metronomic etoposide or temozolomide administered with bevacizumab among recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients who progressed on prior bevacizumab therapy in a phase 2, open-label, two-arm trial. Twenty-three patients received bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks with either oral etoposide (50 mg/m2) daily for 21 consecutive days each month or daily temozolomide (50 mg/m2). The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6) and secondary endpoints included safety and overall survival. Both the etoposide and temozolomide arms of the study closed at the interim analysis due to lack of adequate anti-tumor activity. No radiographic responses were observed. Although 12 patients (52%) achieved stable disease, PFS-6 was 4.4% and the median PFS was 7.3 weeks. The only grade 4 adverse event was reversible neutropenia. Grade 3 toxicities included fatigue (n = 2) and infection (n = 1). Metronomic etoposide or temozolomide is ineffective when administered with bevacizumab among recurrent GBM patients who have progressed on prior bevacizumab therapy. Alternative treatment strategies remain critically needed for this indication.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsDacarbazineDisease-Free SurvivalEtoposideFemaleGlioblastomaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKarnofsky Performance StatusMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabDacarbazineEtoposideTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID20853132
PMCPMC3102515
OpenAlexW2027170726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.