Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20851899›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2010

Predicting plasmid promiscuity based on genomic signature.

Haruo Suzuki, Hirokazu Yano, Celeste J Brown, Eva M Top

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Megaplasmids associate withbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haruo SuzukiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-3051, USA.
Hirokazu Yano
Celeste J Brown
Eva M Top

Funding

UNDERGRADUATE COLLEGE OUTREACH PROGRAMP20RR016454 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI CHASE, JENNIFER R · 2001 to 2011
$35.3M
The Evolution of Protein FlexibilityP20RR016448 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI ROBISON, BARRIE D · 2002 to 2011
$19.3M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016448NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016454NCRR NIH HHS P20RR016454NCRR NIH HHS P20RR16448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the important contribution of self-transmissible plasmids to bacterial evolution, little is understood about the range of hosts in which these plasmids have evolved. Our goal was to infer this so-called evolutionary host range. The nucleotide composition, or genomic signature, of plasmids is often similar to that of the chromosome of their current host, suggesting that plasmids acquire their hosts' signature over time. Therefore, we examined whether the evolutionary host range of plasmids could be inferred by comparing their trinucleotide composition to that of all completely sequenced bacterial chromosomes. The diversity of candidate hosts was determined using taxonomic classification and genetic distance. The method was first tested using plasmids from six incompatibility (Inc) groups whose host ranges are generally thought to be narrow (IncF, IncH, and IncI) or broad (IncN, IncP, and IncW) and then applied to other plasmid groups. The evolutionary host range was found to be broad for IncP plasmids, narrow for IncF and IncI plasmids, and intermediate for IncH and IncN plasmids, which corresponds with their known host range. The IncW plasmids as well as several plasmids from the IncA/C, IncP, IncQ, IncU, and PromA groups have signatures that were not similar to any of the chromosomal signatures, raising the hypothesis that these plasmids have not been ameliorated in any host due to their promiscuous nature. The inferred evolutionary host range of IncA/C, IncP-9, and IncL/M plasmids requires further investigation. In this era of high-throughput sequencing, this genomic signature method is a useful tool for predicting the host range of novel mobile elements.

Indexed as

CodonGene Transfer, HorizontalPlasmidsCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialEvolution, MolecularCodonDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID20851899
PMCPMC2976448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.