Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20851705›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2010

Identification of critical residues for the tight binding of both correct and incorrect nucleotides to human DNA polymerase λ.

Jessica A Brown, Lindsey R Pack, Shanen M Sherrer, Ajay K Kshetry, Sean A Newmister, Jason D Fowler, John-Stephen Taylor, Zucai Suo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Structural basis for the binding and incorporation of nucleotide analogs with L-stereochemistry by human DNA polymerase λ.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica A BrownDepartment of Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Lindsey R Pack
Shanen M Sherrer
Ajay K Kshetry
Sean A Newmister
Jason D Fowler
John-Stephen Taylor
Zucai Suo
The Ohio State University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

DNA PHOTOLESION STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPSR01CA040463 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, JOHN-STEPHEN ADOLFINO · 1985 to 2015
$4.4M
CHEMISTRY/BIOLOGY TRAINING GRANTT32GM008512 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PEI, DEHUA · 1996 to 2016
$3.9M
Mechanistic and Structure-Function Studies of Human DNA Polymerase LambdaR01GM079403 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUO, ZUCAI · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
DNA PHOTOLESION STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPSR37CA040463 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, JOHN-STEPHEN ADOLFINO · 1993 to 2000
$329k
NCI NIH HHS CA040463NCI NIH HHS R01 CA040463NCI NIH HHS R37 CA040463NIGMS NIH HHS GM079403NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079403NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008512NIGMS NIH HHS T32-GM008512-13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA polymerase λ (Pol λ) is a novel X-family DNA polymerase that shares 34% sequence identity with DNA polymerase β. Pre-steady-state kinetic studies have shown that the Pol λ-DNA complex binds both correct and incorrect nucleotides 130-fold tighter, on average, than the DNA polymerase β-DNA complex, although the base substitution fidelity of both polymerases is 10(-)(4) to 10(-5). To better understand Pol λ's tight nucleotide binding affinity, we created single-substitution and double-substitution mutants of Pol λ to disrupt the interactions between active-site residues and an incoming nucleotide or a template base. Single-turnover kinetic assays showed that Pol λ binds to an incoming nucleotide via cooperative interactions with active-site residues (R386, R420, K422, Y505, F506, A510, and R514). Disrupting protein interactions with an incoming correct or incorrect nucleotide impacted binding to each of the common structural moieties in the following order: triphosphate≫base>ribose. In addition, the loss of Watson-Crick hydrogen bonding between the nucleotide and the template base led to a moderate increase in K(d). The fidelity of Pol λ was maintained predominantly by a single residue, R517, which has minor groove interactions with the DNA template.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAmino Acid SubstitutionBase PairingBase SequenceCatalytic DomainDeoxyribonucleotidesDNADNA Polymerase betaHumansHydrogen BondingIn Vitro TechniquesKineticsModels, MolecularMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutant ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsDeoxyribonucleotidesDNADNA Polymerase betaDNA polymerase beta2Mutant ProteinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20851705
PMCPMC2957559
OpenAlexW2065156066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.